Bug#1059892: marked as done (qa.debian.org: uscan version too old and not using recent @ANY_VERSION@ expansion)

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2024 13:09:52 + with message-id <65dddf205e913_2433439607...@godard.mail> and subject line Bug#1059892 fixed in qa.debian.org has caused the Debian Bug report #1059892, regarding qa.debian.org: uscan version too old and not using recent @ANY_VERSION@ expansion to

Bug#993500: marked as done (UDD/upstream: Watch should honor npm source)

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2024 13:09:52 + with message-id <65dddf2071077_2433439607...@godard.mail> and subject line Bug#993500 fixed in qa.debian.org has caused the Debian Bug report #993500, regarding UDD/upstream: Watch should honor npm source to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#993500: (no subject)

2024-02-27 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
cont...@bugs.debian.org Bcc: Subject: Re: Bug#993500: Watch sould honor npm source Reply-To: In-Reply-To: reopen 993500 thanks On 23/12/22 at 15:06 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 23/12/22 at 14:34 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Control: retitle -1 UDD/upstream: Watch should honor npm sour

Bug#1059892: qa.debian.org: uscan version too old and not using recent @ANY_VERSION@ expansion

2024-02-27 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 26/02/24 at 11:56 -0800, Xiyue Deng wrote: > Friendly ping. Any updates on progress? Hi, I just fixed this by using a vendorized devscripts in UDD. Packages will get re-checked over the next few days. Lucas

Processed: Re: Bug#993500: (no subject)

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 993500 Bug #993500 {Done: Lucas Nussbaum } [qa.debian.org] UDD/upstream: Watch should honor npm source Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #993500 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping processing her

Re: remark about the UDD upload_history table

2024-02-27 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, > Le mer. 14 févr. 2024 à 19:36, Patrice Duroux > a écrit : > > > > Hi, > > > > I am a bit surprised with the following output: > > > > udd=> select distinct distribution from upload_history; > > distribution > > - I filed a bug about that, but unfor

Bug#1064913: UDD/upload_history: strange values in the 'distribution' column

2024-02-27 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: qa.debian.org User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: udd The email parsing that is at the core of the upload_history table generates some erroneous values. - Forwarded message from Patrice Duroux - From: Patrice Duroux To: debian-qa Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 19:36:24

Processed: UDD bug triaging

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1060201 qa.debian.org: carnivore is lacking lots of entries Bug #1060201 [qa.debian.org] qa.debian.org: [udd] carnivore_emails is lacking lots of entries Changed Bug title to 'qa.debian.org: carnivore is lacking lots of entries' from 'qa

Bug#993500: marked as done (UDD/upstream: Watch should honor npm source)

2024-02-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 27 Feb 2024 18:48:24 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#993500: (no subject) has caused the Debian Bug report #993500, regarding UDD/upstream: Watch should honor npm source to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#1064951: UDD/upload_history: importer broken by switch to detached PGP signatures

2024-02-27 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: important User: qa.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: udd The upload_history importer parses email received by the debian-devel-changes mailing list. On 2024-02-11, the format of those emails changed to multipart/signed. Previously the PGP signature was inlin