Bug#863160: marked as done (DDPO should filter out packages with Extra-Source-Only:yes)

Your message dated Tue, 08 Jan 2019 12:06:40 + with message-id <5c3492502da43_26a22acaa7e090c498...@godard.mail> and subject line Bug #863160 in qa.debian.org fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #863160, regarding DDPO should filter out packages with Extra-Source-Only:yes to be marked as don

Bug#775292: marked as done (qa.debian.org: popcon showing several wrong information for Ruby packages in experimental)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Jan 2019 13:15:15 +0100 with message-id <20190108121515.ga7...@msg.df7cb.de> and subject line Re: Bug#775292: qa.debian.org: popcon showing several wrong information for Ruby packages in experimental has caused the Debian Bug report #775292, regarding qa.debian.org: popco

Bug#785612: marked as done ([DDPO] backports.org -> backports.debian.org)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Jan 2019 13:16:52 +0100 with message-id <20190108121652.ga7...@msg.df7cb.de> and subject line Re: Bug#785612: [DDPO] backports.org -> backports.debian.org has caused the Debian Bug report #785612, regarding [DDPO] backports.org -> backports.debian.org to be marked as don

Bug#785615: marked as done (DDPO: HTTPS everywhere)

Your message dated Tue, 08 Jan 2019 12:29:28 + with message-id <5c3497a83b4d7_26a22acaa7e090c498...@godard.mail> and subject line Bug #785615 in qa.debian.org fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #785615, regarding DDPO: HTTPS everywhere to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#457816: marked as done (qa.debian.org: DDPO sometimes shows the incoming version under "Testing" also)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Jan 2019 13:34:00 +0100 with message-id <20190108123400.ga12...@msg.df7cb.de> and subject line Re: Bug#457816: qa.debian.org: DDPO sometimes shows the incoming version under "Testing" also has caused the Debian Bug report #457816, regarding qa.debian.org: DDPO sometimes s

Bug#798826: marked as done (DDPO: displays not-for-us in reproducible builds column for architectures excluded in the package)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Jan 2019 13:42:08 +0100 with message-id <20190108124208.ga14...@msg.df7cb.de> and subject line Re: Bug#798826: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#798826: DDPO: displays not-for-us in reproducible builds column for architectures excluded in the package has caused the Debian Bug re

Bug#433963: marked as done (DDPO: please have an option to hide [RM] packages)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Jan 2019 13:48:18 +0100 with message-id <20190108124818.ga14...@msg.df7cb.de> and subject line Re: Bug#433963: DDPO: please have an option to hide [RM] packages has caused the Debian Bug report #433963, regarding DDPO: please have an option to hide [RM] packages to be mar

Bug#508887: marked as done (DDPO: buildd link for experimental if there's a pkg in exp)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Jan 2019 13:56:15 +0100 with message-id <20190108125615.ga15...@msg.df7cb.de> and subject line Re: Bug#508887: DDPO: buildd link for experimental if there's a pkg in exp has caused the Debian Bug report #508887, regarding DDPO: buildd link for experimental if there's a pk

Bug#505190: marked as done (developer.php incorrectly reports package versions in stable (for packages which are not in stable at all))

Your message dated Tue, 8 Jan 2019 13:51:58 +0100 with message-id <20190108125158.ga15...@msg.df7cb.de> and subject line Re: Bug#505190: developer.php incorrectly reports package versions in stable has caused the Debian Bug report #505190, regarding developer.php incorrectly reports package versio

Bug#461047: marked as done (DDPO: qa.debian.org: For saving a few pixels...)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Jan 2019 14:58:39 +0100 with message-id <20190108135839.ga19...@msg.df7cb.de> and subject line Re: Bug#461047: DDPO: qa.debian.org: For saving a few pixels... has caused the Debian Bug report #461047, regarding DDPO: qa.debian.org: For saving a few pixels... to be marked a

Bug#781519: marked as done (DDPO: shows packages I no longer maintain)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Jan 2019 15:22:14 +0100 with message-id <20190108142214.ga25...@msg.df7cb.de> and subject line Re: Bug#736715: PTS shouldn't list packages under their maintainer in stable has caused the Debian Bug report #736715, regarding DDPO: shows packages I no longer maintain to be

Bug#736715: marked as done (DDPO shouldn't list packages under their maintainer in stable)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Jan 2019 15:22:14 +0100 with message-id <20190108142214.ga25...@msg.df7cb.de> and subject line Re: Bug#736715: PTS shouldn't list packages under their maintainer in stable has caused the Debian Bug report #736715, regarding DDPO shouldn't list packages under their maintai

Bug#761697: marked as done (DDPO: showing package adopted by third-party as being mine)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Jan 2019 15:22:14 +0100 with message-id <20190108142214.ga25...@msg.df7cb.de> and subject line Re: Bug#736715: PTS shouldn't list packages under their maintainer in stable has caused the Debian Bug report #736715, regarding DDPO: showing package adopted by third-party as

Bug#703293: marked as done (qa.debian.org: DDPO does not synced WNPP from BTS)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Jan 2019 15:18:31 +0100 with message-id <20190108141831.ga24...@msg.df7cb.de> and subject line Re: Bug#703293: qa.debian.org: DDPO does not synced WNPP from BTS has caused the Debian Bug report #703293, regarding qa.debian.org: DDPO does not synced WNPP from BTS to be mar

Bug#782909: marked as done (DDPO: broken reproducible.d.n link for experimental-only packages)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Jan 2019 15:42:02 +0100 with message-id <20190108144202.ga26...@msg.df7cb.de> and subject line Re: Bug#782909: DDPO: broken reproducible.d.n link for experimental-only packages has caused the Debian Bug report #782909, regarding DDPO: broken reproducible.d.n link for expe

Bug#856324: marked as done (DDPO should display sid-strict piuparts results)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Jan 2019 15:56:14 +0100 with message-id <20190108145614.ga28...@msg.df7cb.de> and subject line Re: Bug#856324: DDPO should display sid-strict piuparts results has caused the Debian Bug report #856324, regarding DDPO should display sid-strict piuparts results to be marked a

Bug#755297: marked as done (please mention version in ci.debian.net column)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Jan 2019 16:35:06 +0100 with message-id <20190108153506.ga31...@msg.df7cb.de> and subject line Re: Bug#755297: please mention version in ci.debian.net column has caused the Debian Bug report #755297, regarding please mention version in ci.debian.net column to be marked as

Processed: reassign 302575 to tracker.debian.org

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 302575 tracker.debian.org Bug #302575 [qa.debian.org] PTS: show popcon installations, % etc. also Bug reassigned from package 'qa.debian.org' to 'tracker.debian.org'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #302575 to the same val

Bug#469258: marked as done (DDPO: please show number of release-goal bugs)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Jan 2019 17:05:14 +0100 with message-id <20190108160514.ga2...@msg.df7cb.de> and subject line Re: Bug#469258: PTS/DDPO should include bugs tagged as release-goals in statistics has caused the Debian Bug report #469258, regarding DDPO: please show number of release-goal bu

Bug#567187: DDPO: suggestion: popcon for ITP entries

Re: Vincent Fourmond 2010-01-27 <20100127202504.8551.4855.report...@tanyaivinco.homelinux.org> > It would be nice if the popcon entry was also displayed for ITPs > too. Often, there is a significant number of users that did install > unofficial packages, and knowing they are there is a motivatio

Bug#830953: marked as done (DDPO: provides outdated 'Uploader' informations in package version tooltips)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Jan 2019 17:15:33 +0100 with message-id <20190108161533.ga3...@msg.df7cb.de> and subject line Re: Bug#830953: DDPO: provides outdated 'Uploader' informations in package version tooltips has caused the Debian Bug report #830953, regarding DDPO: provides outdated 'Uploader'

Bug#918714: DDPO: hide debcheck by default until it's improved?

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist Hi! Considering that debcheck hasn't seen any love in quite a while, what about disabling it in DDPO's default view? Its warnings are bogus or non-problems -- and false positive issues tend to make people ignore issues that are actually worth fixing. For

Bug#694039: marked as done (qa.debian.org: Use a different color for outdated backports)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Jan 2019 17:25:32 +0100 with message-id <20190108162532.ga5...@msg.df7cb.de> and subject line Re: Bug#694039: qa.debian.org: Use a different color for outdated backports has caused the Debian Bug report #694039, regarding qa.debian.org: Use a different color for outdated

Bug#678135: qa.debian.org: Tables on Developer's QA page are quite inaccessible

Control: tags -1 moreinfo Re: Mario Lang 2012-06-19 <87d34vqwqr@x4.delysid.org> > Package: qa.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > I am looking at > > http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mlang%40debian.org > > and notice that the way how the information presented there is rendered > as

Processed: Re: Bug#678135: qa.debian.org: Tables on Developer's QA page are quite inaccessible

Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #678135 [qa.debian.org] qa.debian.org: Tables on Developer's QA page are quite inaccessible Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 678135: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678135 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit