Your message dated Tue, 8 Jan 2019 15:22:14 +0100
with message-id <20190108142214.ga25...@msg.df7cb.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#736715: PTS shouldn't list packages under their
maintainer in stable
has caused the Debian Bug report #736715,
regarding DDPO: showing package adopted by third-party as being mine
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
736715: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736715
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I orphaned the package pacman4console in 2014-07-25. The package was
adopted by Alexandre Dantas in 2014-08-12 and I was the sponsor.
Currently, the package is shown in both DDPO[1][2].
I reviewed the package again and I can't see errors. So, it appear be
a DDPO bug.
Thanks for your attention.
Cheers,
Eriberto
[1] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=eribe...@debian.org
[2] https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=e...@alexdantas.net
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Re: Adrian Bunk 2014-01-26 <20140126111623.26517.17762.reportbug@localhost>
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
> It is confusing that pages like
> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=packa...@qa.debian.org
> list whoever maintained packages also under whoever is listed in
> the maintainer field in stable - that person might have given up
> maintainership of the package many years ago (or here in the case
> of packa...@qa.debian.org, it is no longer of any interest for QA
> since it does now have a maintainer).
[...]
> I'd expect the maintainer in unstable to be the one and only being
> responsible for all versions of the package.
The logic has been improved recently. Now it lists all packages in
unstable and experimental, plus all (old*)stable packages that have
been removed (but might still be RC-buggy in stable). Packages that
have switched maintainers between stable and unstable are no longer
listed.
Christoph
--- End Message ---
