Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
It seems that fakeupstream.cgi returns empty response if upstream=sf/* is
specified.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
I've noticed that accessing the following
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 5:21 PM, Kentaro Hayashi wrote:
> It seems that fakeupstream.cgi returns empty response if upstream=sf/* is
> specified.
This does some terrible HTML parsing, I suggest using the official SF
redirector documented in the uscan manual page, it does something that
is much mo
Hi folks,
In trying to download Debian-Edu install images I'm never getting a download
that gives a checksum that matches the checksums given.
Help would be appreciated.
Sincerely, Gregory D. MELLOTT
Control: tag -1 + newcomer
Hi Adam,
thanks for the report.
On Thu, 26 Jul 2018, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/postgresql-9.6 reports both that the
> package is "not in any development repository", and that "[t]he package
> is severely out of date with respect to the Deb
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + newcomer
Bug #904694 [tracker.debian.org] tracker.debian.org: don't complain about
outdated S-V for packages only in <= stable
Added tag(s) newcomer.
--
904694: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=904694
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow
Hi Gregory,
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 02:59:20PM -0400, NGAndMainAccess MELLOTT wrote:
> In trying to download Debian-Edu install images I'm never getting a download
> that gives a checksum that matches the checksums given.
what image did you download from where?
what checksum did you expect? (wh
6 matches
Mail list logo
