Bug#812609: tracker.debian.org: wrong versioned links for security versions

2017-07-19 Thread Antoine Beaupre
Package: tracker.debian.org Followup-For: Bug #812609 Same issue here. I always end up going to the packages.debian.org site to find the .dsc link... -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.0 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental'), (1, 'unstable') Architecture: a

mass-removing packages that missed both jessie and stretch?

2017-07-19 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi, It is becoming increasingly painful to do QA work due to the number of packages in unstable that have been completely broken for a long time. I've been pondering with ignoring packages not in testing when doing archive rebuilds, but that's not really a good solution. So, I propose that we re

Re: mass-removing packages that missed both jessie and stretch?

2017-07-19 Thread Paul Wise
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > mass-removing packages that missed both jessie and stretch? I don't like this at all, but I'm not doing archive rebuilds, so... > It is becoming increasingly painful to do QA work due to the number of > packages in unstable that have been

Bug#868996: tracker.debian.org: broken entry for linux package in old-upd (3.16.7-ckt25-2)

2017-07-19 Thread Boyuan Yang
Package: tracker.debian.org Severity: normal Please, check out the "versions" section on https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/linux You can see one line called: old-upd: 3.16.7-ckt25-2 Which provides a broken link on packages.debian.org . I am wondering why this link is not removed now that ckt- k

Re: mass-removing packages that missed both jessie and stretch?

2017-07-19 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 20/07/17 at 11:00 +1000, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > It is becoming increasingly painful to do QA work due to the number of > > packages in unstable that have been completely broken for a long time. > > Could you detail what the pain points are