On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > mass-removing packages that missed both jessie and stretch?
I don't like this at all, but I'm not doing archive rebuilds, so... > It is becoming increasingly painful to do QA work due to the number of > packages in unstable that have been completely broken for a long time. Could you detail what the pain points are for archive rebuilds? > I've been pondering with ignoring packages not in testing when doing > archive rebuilds, but that's not really a good solution. Could you detail why ignoring packages not in testing is not a solution? > Here is a list, with the popcon insts, and the last upload: Some of these were removed due to bugs that are only a problem in certain situations. Some of these are related to a specific blend/team packages and might warrant a separate ping to the relevant discussion lists, I expect that few folks read the team lists in Maintainer fields any more. Some of these have solutions. Some of these are for important areas like mobile. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
