Processed: PTS: shouldn't suggest packaging new upstream release when it is waiting in NEW

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 499546 PTS: shouldn't suggest packaging new upstream release when it > is waiting in NEW Bug #499546 [qa.debian.org] [DEHS] shouldn't suggest packaging new upstream release when suitable version is in NEW Changed Bug title to 'PTS: shoul

Bug#499546: PTS: shouldn't suggest packaging new upstream release when it is waiting in NEW

retitle 499546 PTS: shouldn't suggest packaging new upstream release when it is waiting in NEW user qa.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 499546 - dehs usertags 499546 + pts stop I agree with the original bug report that it's a bug in PTS. DEHS contains uscan results. An uscan result may b

Bug#572243: marked as done ([DEHS] watch file not picked up by DEHS, pkg displayed as having no watch file)

Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:10:03 + with message-id <20121030071003.ge25...@master.debian.org> and subject line [DEHS] watch file not picked up by DEHS, pkg displayed as having no watch file has caused the Debian Bug report #572243, regarding [DEHS] watch file not picked up by DEHS,

Bug#690384: DEHS: ignore epoch when considering new upstream releases

Hi, On 2012-10-13 15:36, Bart Martens wrote: On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 04:05:07PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: DEHS does not appear to allow for an epoch when considering watch files for the watch columns on the DDPO. Do you have an example of where this goes wrong ? Sorry I did not repl

Processed: info provided (#690384)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 690384 - moreinfo Bug #690384 [qa.debian.org] DEHS: ignore epoch when considering new upstream releases Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 690384: http://bugs.debian.org/

Please allow UDD access to pet database on wagner.d.o

gregor herrmann writes: > On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:34:16 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > >> since some time UDD cron job is spamming me with messages like these >> but I do not speal Ruby so can't help here. > > PET moved from Ansgar's machine to Alioth not so long ago; > 217.196.43.134 resolves to al

Bug#691849: pts: link to mail archive for maintainer mailing list

Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist I would be nice if the PTS would include a link to the maintainer mailing list archive (at least if it is on lists.(alioth.)?d.o). There's already one such link on packages.d.o in the "Maintainers" section on the right side, see for example [1]. [1]

admin hc与您共享了照片

Hi Sirs/Madams, This is Mickey from H&C Printing Centre. I got your information from your website, knowing that you might be in need of related printing service. We are professional company in printing for several years and enjoy a good reputation from our clients in European, North America

Bug#690384: marked as done (DEHS: ignore epoch when considering new upstream releases)

Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2012 16:52:15 + with message-id <20121030165215.ga25...@master.debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#690384: DEHS: ignore epoch when considering new upstream releases has caused the Debian Bug report #690384, regarding DEHS: ignore epoch when considering new upstr

Processed: Re: Bug#690384: DEHS: ignore epoch when considering new upstream releases

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 690384 Bug #690384 {Done: Bart Martens } [qa.debian.org] DEHS: ignore epoch when considering new upstream releases Bug reopened Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #690384 to the same values previously set > stop Stopping proc

Bug#690384: DEHS: ignore epoch when considering new upstream releases

reopen 690384 stop I think that this is an example : http://packages.qa.debian.org/z/zodb.html http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?packages=zodb http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/watch?pkg=zodb_1%3A3.9.7-2 | package: zodb | debian-uversion: 1:3.9.7 | debian-mangled-uversion: 1:3.9.7 | upstre

Bug#690384: marked as done (DEHS: ignore epoch when considering new upstream releases)

Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2012 20:13:16 + with message-id and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 2851 has caused the Debian Bug report #690384, regarding DEHS: ignore epoch when considering new upstream releases to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#647894: marked as done (qa.debian.org: DEHS uses watch file from sid (fixed for a branch) for package in experimental (should accept latest))

Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:17:47 + with message-id <20121030211747.gc25...@master.debian.org> and subject line qa.debian.org: DEHS uses watch file from sid (fixed for a branch) for package in experimental (should accept latest) has caused the Debian Bug report #647894, regarding qa

Bug#344847: marked as done (thuriaux's scripts & definite MIAs)

Your message dated Tue, 30 Oct 2012 21:21:30 + with message-id <20121030212130.gd25...@master.debian.org> and subject line thuriaux's scripts & definite MIAs has caused the Debian Bug report #344847, regarding thuriaux's scripts & definite MIAs to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Bug#690384: marked as done (DEHS: ignore epoch when considering new upstream releases)

Your message dated Wed, 31 Oct 2012 05:58:35 + with message-id and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 2852 has caused the Debian Bug report #690384, regarding DEHS: ignore epoch when considering new upstream releases to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#484873: marked as done (packages.qa.debian.org: should it still list oldstable?)

Your message dated Wed, 31 Oct 2012 06:52:26 + with message-id <20121031065226.gb12...@master.debian.org> and subject line packages.qa.debian.org: should it still list oldstable has caused the Debian Bug report #484873, regarding packages.qa.debian.org: should it still list oldstable? to be mar