I recently orphaned xsupplicant after a couple of months of looking for
another maintainer, however, the more I think about it the more I feel
that I should have just asked for its removal.
It is for all intents and purposes dead upstream, and these days I know
of no situation where wpasupplicant
Your message dated Mon, 11 Aug 2008 02:57:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 1951
has caused the Debian Bug report #370087,
regarding [pts] add short description tooltip over binary package names
to be marked as done.
This means that
Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org:
> reassign 494557 qa.debian.org
Bug#494557: ftp.debian.org: Maintainer of pastebinit package not receiving bug
mail
Bug reassigned from package `ftp.debian.org' to `qa.debian.org'.
> retitle 494557 'PTS: Maintainer of pastebinit package not receiv
retitle 320431 [PTS] should list extra versions from: volatile, backports
thanks
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 06:44:13PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Under "Available versions", please add the versions available on
> mentors.debian.net and backports.org (check current stable - sarge). The
> list should pr
Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org:
> retitle 320431 [PTS] should list extra versions from: volatile, backports
Bug#320431: PTS: add links to versions from backports.org and mentors.debian.net
Changed Bug title to `[PTS] should list extra versions from: volatile,
backports' from `PTS:
5 matches
Mail list logo