Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can someone please check if those packages should be removed from the
> archive:
[...]
> libcache-mmap-perl
> libmasonx-interp-withcallbacks-perl
> libparams-callbackrequest-perl
[...]
Bricolage depends on these. Daniel, would you like to adopt them
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can someone please check if those packages should be removed from the
> archive:
[...]
> ieee80211
[...]
ipw2100 depends on it (along with ipw2200, but the latter is
orphaned). Sebastian, would you like to adopt ieee80211?
Thanks,
Matej
--
To U
On 2006-04-03, Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Can someone please check if those packages should be removed from the
>> archive:
> [...]
>> ieee80211
> [...]
>
> ipw2100 depends on it (along with ipw2200, but the latter is
> orphaned). Seba
Matej Vela wrote:
> Bricolage depends on these. Daniel, would you like to adopt them?
I can do that, yes. Give me a week or so and I'll take care. Thanks for
the hint.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http:
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 01:33:47PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 10:10:58PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Can someone please check if those packages should be removed from the
> > archive:
May I also suggest kernel-patch-uml? it's quite outdated now and 2.6
includes U
> Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ipw2100 depends on it (along with ipw2200, but the latter is
> orphaned). Sebastian, would you like to adopt ieee80211?
No, I think it is best, to orphan ipw2100 as well. The module is now part
of the official kernel (along with iee80211 and ipw22
"Sebastian Ley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> ipw2100 depends on it (along with ipw2200, but the latter is
>> orphaned). Sebastian, would you like to adopt ieee80211?
>
> No, I think it is best, to orphan ipw2100 as well. The module is now part
> of the official kernel (along with iee80211 and i
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> My "wnpp-disposable" scripts shows them; this script looks for
> packages that have never been in a stable release.
Something's amiss: falconseye, doxymacs, and wap-wml-tools did release
with woody.
> I realize it's a bit early to run this scr
* Matej Vela wrote:
> Okay, orphaned for now (#360632).
Thanks.
> Back in January[1], the consensus seemed to be that it's too early to
> remove ieee80211. Is this still the case?
Testing now has 2.6.15. I successfully used the modules from 2.6.15 (and now
2.6.16). I can only repeat, that pac
* Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-03 22:05]:
> > My "wnpp-disposable" scripts shows them; this script looks for
> > packages that have never been in a stable release.
> Something's amiss: falconseye, doxymacs, and wap-wml-tools did release
> with woody.
It only checks the latest stable ver
On Mon, 03 Apr 2006 22:05:01 +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> [...]
>> My "wnpp-disposable" scripts shows them; this script looks for
>> packages that have never been in a stable release.
>
> Something's amiss: falconseye, doxymacs, and wap-wml-tools di
On Mon, 03 Apr 2006, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On 2006-04-03, Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> Can someone please check if those packages should be removed from the
> >> archive:
> > [...]
> >> ieee80211
> > [...]
> >
> > ipw2100 depe
Hello debian-apache@lists.debian.org,
A Gen_uine Coll`ege Deg.ree in 2 weeks Cal_l us now_!-> 206-338-6061
Within 2 weeks! No Study Required! 1_0_0_% Veri.fiable!
Right now the following deg.rees are being offered:
B/A, .B/S/C, .M/A,.M/S/C,.M/B/A, .P/H/D,
C.al_l us now_
13 matches
Mail list logo
