"Sebastian Ley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> ipw2100 depends on it (along with ipw2200, but the latter is >> orphaned). Sebastian, would you like to adopt ieee80211? > > No, I think it is best, to orphan ipw2100 as well. The module is now part > of the official kernel (along with iee80211 and ipw2200) and it is a pain > to maintain ipw2100 with the external ieee80211 paclage. The module that > comes with the kernel is reasonably stable so I presume there is no more > need to package the modules separatly.
Okay, orphaned for now (#360632). Back in January[1], the consensus seemed to be that it's too early to remove ieee80211. Is this still the case? [1] <http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2006/01/msg00165.html> Thanks, Matej -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
