Quoting Jeroen van Wolffelaar:
> Hi Raphaël,
>
> At http://www.wolffelaar.nl/~jeroen/pts.bugs.txt you can find fresh
> (pushed from spohr, directly regenerated) bug information for the PTS.
> New bugsummaries are moved over, so you should never get only a part of
> the file.
>
> Andreas Barth tol
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 07:50:57AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> That's why the data are out of date ... I was too lazy to change it back
> again. Now, I have switched to your file but I'd like to have that on a
> .debian.org site for the longer term.
Yeah, me too, this is really a temporary sol
Quoting Andreas Barth:
> * Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040415 08:55]:
> > Quoting Colin Watson:
> > > > Because packages.qa.d.o is on master, it uses master's bug mirror, and I
> > > > guess that's the reason the bugcounts aren't updated anymore on
> > > > packages.qa.d.o
> > >
> > > mast
On Friday 30 April 2004 15.25, Andreas Kotes wrote:
> What do you think? Signed binaries instead of tools like tripwire or
> aide et all?
Solutions like tripwire and aide, or the forthcoming (when???) solution
of signing binary packages (together with the package containing
md5sums of all non-m
Mon, 03 May 2004 00:10:20 -0800
Wholesale Rx - http://www.metro-savings.com/jw
Take A Step Into The Future And Join The Millions Of People Already Using Rx
Meds Online. Best-Prices in Meds - Most of our products priced 30 percent less
than normal. No Prior Rx Required - Shipped-Direct to Your
* Raphael Hertzog ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040503 07:55]:
> Quoting Jeroen van Wolffelaar:
> > Hi Raphaël,
> >
> > At http://www.wolffelaar.nl/~jeroen/pts.bugs.txt you can find fresh
> > (pushed from spohr, directly regenerated) bug information for the PTS.
> > New bugsummaries are moved over, so you
Heya,
* Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040503 09:20]:
> On Friday 30 April 2004 15.25, Andreas Kotes wrote:
> > What do you think? Signed binaries instead of tools like tripwire or
> > aide et all?
>
> Solutions like tripwi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
http://incoming.debian.org/?M=A
libcommons-collections-java-doc_2.1-1.1_all.deb 08-Apr-2004 09:02 7k
libcommons-collections-java_2.1-1.1_all.deb 08-Apr-2004 09:02 173k
What is the problem with those?
Also, these one are stuck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't know if it's a known problem because I have a huge mail back log
;-) but http://ftp-master.debian.org/queue-new/ is Not Found and returns
a 404...
Is there another URL?
Cheers,
- --
.''`.
: :' :rnaud
`. `'
`-
-BEGIN PGP SI
Quoting Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I don't know if it's a known problem because I have a huge mail back log
> ;-) but http://ftp-master.debian.org/queue-new/ is Not Found and returns
> a 404...
>
> Is there another URL?
The URL has
On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 12:30, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > I don't know if it's a known problem because I have a huge mail back log
> > ;-) but http://ftp-master.debian.org/queue-new/ is Not Found and returns
> > a 404...
> > Is there another URL?
> The URL has never existed.
This is slightly wrong.
T
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 01:30:27PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Quoting Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I don't know if it's a known problem because I have a huge mail back log
> > ;-) but http://ftp-master.debian.org/queue-new/ is Not Found and returns
> > a 404...
> >
> > Is there anoth
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 01:36:20PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 12:30, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> > > I don't know if it's a known problem because I have a huge mail back log
> > > ;-) but http://ftp-master.debian.org/queue-new/ is Not Found and returns
> > > a 404...
> > >
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 10:13:29AM +0200, Andreas Kotes wrote:
> hm. thinking of that, ELF signing might help for only part of the
> system. nonetheless, having /sbin/init, the interpreters, basic system
> utilities (fbset, fdisk, e2fsck) verifyable without having to run a
> full-blown file modific
Greetings, and please excuse my tardy replies -- as you can tell I've
got quite a bit of work right now.
If it has been decided that 2.2 will only be in the archive for m68k,
then I think we can just drop all these patches. I'm a wee bit
disappointed at this decision, though, as the main reason f
* Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-03 07:50]:
> I used to generate the stuff on merkel but somehow merkel web config
> doesn't allow me anymore to export the file via my account :
> http://merkel.debian.org/~hertzog/pts/bugs.txt
I can login on merkel. If you want me to run any cron jo
On Mon, 03 May 2004, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Err, so non-DD's cannot check it anymore? Why does that service need to
> be a DD only service? There were only the .changes to begin with.
Complain the the U.S.A government. Access to the new queue HAS to be
restricted due to crypto-in-main. O
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 06:45:51PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-03 07:50]:
> > I used to generate the stuff on merkel but somehow merkel web config
> > doesn't allow me anymore to export the file via my account :
> > http://merkel.debian.org/~hertz
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 243668 packages.qa.d.o should move from master to merkel
Bug#243668: qa.debian.org: bugs on packages.qa.d.o not updated ->
packages.qa.d.o should move to merkel too
Changed Bug title.
> severity 243668 wishlist
Bug#243668: packages.qa.d.o shou
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 03:25:19PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 03 May 2004, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > Err, so non-DD's cannot check it anymore? Why does that service need to
> > be a DD only service? There were only the .changes to begin with.
>
> Complain the the U.
Your message dated Mon, 3 May 2004 20:33:58 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line packages.qa.d.o works again (at least temp.)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
retitle 243668 packages.qa.d.o should move from master to merkel
severity 243668 wishlist
thanks
packages.qa.d.o should still move to merkel, but this is only a
wishlist.
It being on master wasn't the reason for the failed bug stats (which has
been worked around for now).
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen va
On Mon, 03 May 2004, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 03:25:19PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Mon, 03 May 2004, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > Err, so non-DD's cannot check it anymore? Why does that service need to
> > > be a DD only service? There were
Camm Maguire wrote:
> I'm a wee bit
> disappointed at this decision, though, as the main reason for keeping
> the older kernels around is to work with old machines with very
> limited resources, i.e. quasi-embedded. Can one get 2.4 and 2.6 into
> tiny enough form to run a 486 with a floppy only?
Il sab, 2004-05-01 alle 16:18, Jeroen van Wolffelaar ha scritto:
>
> Bluefuture: The interface that is needed for DDPO and the PTS is like
> this:
>
> : [ | "N/A" | "Error" ]
>
> For resp. upstream version, no watch file, and error processing
> watchfile.
>
> --Jeroen
It is very simple for m
(dropped -devel, this is not relevant for -devel)
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 03:39:00AM +0200, Bluefuture wrote:
> Il sab, 2004-05-01 alle 16:18, Jeroen van Wolffelaar ha scritto:
>
> >
> > Bluefuture: The interface that is needed for DDPO and the PTS is like
> > this:
> >
> > : [ | "N/A" | "Erro
Il mar, 2004-05-04 alle 01:51, Jeroen van Wolffelaar ha scritto:
The main problem of DEHS is:
Total Soruces package without Watch File => 6437 (86,19%)
And we must add
Total Package without a checkable upstream => 484 (47.22% of package
with watch file)
Only 1075 on 7468 sources Packages had a "
27 matches
Mail list logo
