Bug#241652: packages.qa.debian.org doesn't refer to source package anymore

2004-04-02 Thread Roland Stigge
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, at http://packages.qa.debian.org/common/index.html, when I input a certain binary package, e.g. dia-common, I was used to be referred to the respective source package, e.g. dia. Now, I get something like: ==

Re: Cleaning up ITA

2004-04-02 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Frank! You wrote: > > I have some scripts on master that simplify checking the wnpp a lot. > > Feel free to use them, they're in master:~bas/WBOS. > > (No warranties of course. Please test before sending out any real > > emails: last time I used the scripts, I send the BTS mail to the wr

Matt Ryan: are you still active?

2004-04-02 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Matt, In a reaction to bug #233556 I asked[1] you two weeks ago to comment on a RC bug open against your only[2] package, ssmtp[3]. I haven't noticed any activity or mail from you since (or since august 2003 for that matter). Please, speak up if you are still willing to maintain this package, ot

Re: Matt Ryan: are you still active?

2004-04-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 01:00:04PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > In a reaction to bug #233556 I asked[1] you two weeks ago to comment on a > RC bug open against your only[2] package, ssmtp[3]. > > I haven't noticed any activity or mail from you since (or since august > 2003 for that matter

Re: Matt Ryan: are you still active?

2004-04-02 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > Please, speak up if you are still willing to maintain this package, > otherwise, it is not unlikely someone else will take over maintainership > of it in the near future, or the package orphaned and maybe removed from > sarge. I'd be willing to take it, if neces

Re: Matt Ryan: are you still active?

2004-04-02 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 12:34:41PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 01:00:04PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > In a reaction to bug #233556 I asked[1] you two weeks ago to comment on a > > RC bug open against your only[2] package, ssmtp[3]. > > > > I haven't noticed any

Re: Orphaning all packages by Matthias Kabel but gtk-gnutella.

2004-04-02 Thread Andreas Metzler
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-30 13:57]: >> Last upload: 2003-06-20 (0.9n-1) >> Latest maintainer contribution to the currently open (15+7) bugs: >> >> But he only seems to maintain gtk-gnutella. The others share ancient >> standard ve

Re: Orphaning all packages by Matthias Kabel but gtk-gnutella.

2004-04-02 Thread Andreas Barth
* Andreas Metzler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040402 16:40]: > Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-30 13:57]: > >> Last upload: 2003-06-20 (0.9n-1) > >> Latest maintainer contribution to the currently open (15+7) bugs: > >> > >> But he only seems

Notification

2004-04-02 Thread emanager
* eManager Notification ** Source mailbox: "debian-qa@lists.debian.org" Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** End of message *** Received: from 213.54.190.248 by viruswall (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 02 Apr 2004 18:42:05

Bug#236096: developer.php not finding bugs

2004-04-02 Thread Igor Genibel
close 236096 thank Le jeudi 4 Mars 2004 11:03, Matthew Palmer a écrit : > On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 10:44:53AM +0100, Igor Genibel wrote: > > developer.php uses the source package for the bugs, that's why it > > doesn't show the binary package related bugs. It's a bug. > > I'm currently fixing this

Processed: Re: Bug#236096: developer.php not finding bugs

2004-04-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 236096 Bug#236096: developer.php not finding bugs 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing. Bug closed, send any further explanations to Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > thank Stopping processing here. Please c

Re: Matt Ryan: are you still active?

2004-04-02 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:27:10PM +0100, Matt Ryan wrote: > This is true - I have no time to keep on top of my package. I did plan > to orphan it but I have not got around to this and I'm not sure my PGP > key works any longer anyway as I was asked to get a new one generated > and signed which

Re: Matt Ryan: are you still active?

2004-04-02 Thread Matt Ryan
This is true - I have no time to keep on top of my package. I did plan to orphan it but I have not got around to this and I'm not sure my PGP key works any longer anyway as I was asked to get a new one generated and signed which I have also not found time for. A new maintainer would be best oth

Re: Matt Ryan: are you still active?

2004-04-02 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-02 14:41]: > > Please, speak up if you are still willing to maintain this package, > > otherwise, it is not unlikely someone else will take over maintainership > > of it in the near future, or the package orphaned and maybe removed from > > sarge. >

Re: Matt Ryan: are you still active?

2004-04-02 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 02:00:11AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Matthias Urlichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-02 14:41]: > > > Please, speak up if you are still willing to maintain this package, > > > otherwise, it is not unlikely someone else will take over maintainership > > > of it in the