On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 02:21:37AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
Hi,
> * Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-04 03:49]:
> > Johann Botha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. One package (ldap2dns) with RC bug
> > open since October -- hasn't responded to bug trail yet.
>
> Thanks, I contacted him.
Please remove the rcconf package from Sarge. In my opinion it
is not adequate as a runlevel editor and is not release quality.
It is buggy. The maintainer isn't particularly active. A far
superior alternative has been written by Joe Oppegaard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. He is currently tuning the prog
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 09:31:59AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> Please remove the rcconf package from Sarge. In my opinion it
> is not adequate as a runlevel editor and is not release quality.
> It is buggy. The maintainer isn't particularly active. A far
> superior alternative has been written b
Hi,
I'd like to get /devel/wnpp current again. What's the recommended way
to do this? I'm quite willing to write the needed code, set up cron
jobs etc, but how to put the result on the web site?
Cheers,
Andi
PS: Please Cc me or debian-qa (or both) on answers.
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 02:33:27PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to get /devel/wnpp current again. What's the recommended way
> to do this? I'm quite willing to write the needed code, set up cron
> jobs etc, but how to put the result on the web site?
Send a patch/new script to de
* Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-06 14:33]:
> I'd like to get /devel/wnpp current again. What's the recommended way
> to do this? I'm quite willing to write the needed code, set up cron
> jobs etc, but how to put the result on the web site?
Basically, you have to replace or adapt the e
* Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-06 14:45]:
> > I'd like to get /devel/wnpp current again. What's the recommended way
> > to do this? I'm quite willing to write the needed code, set up cron
> > jobs etc, but how to put the result on the web site?
>
> Send a patch/new script to debi
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:55:14AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Martin Michlmayr writes:
> > * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-27 14:14]:
> > > The question is: Should we wait for someone to adopt it or remove it
> > > from unstable? (I would go for removal)
> >
> > Removal is pro
Hi,
Two requests regarding proccess-index.pl:
- Igor, sometimes a lot of packages have no bugcount. This is because
you directly do process-index.pl > bugs.txt, in stead of
process-index.pl > bugs.txt.new ; mv bugs.txt.new bugs.txt
If you do the to-dba processing also in process-index.pl (b
Frank Lichtenheld writes:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 11:55:14AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Martin Michlmayr writes:
> > > * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-27 14:14]:
> > > > The question is: Should we wait for someone to adopt it or remove it
> > > > from unstable? (I would go
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 02:27:53AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Davide Puricelli (evo) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signed his key; evo, do you
> know anything about the status of Mattia?
I saw him on IRC not a long time ago, probably three-four weeks ago, but
I didn't speak with him, so I don't have m
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 09:31:59AM +0100, Thomas Hood imagined:
> Please remove the rcconf package from Sarge. In my opinion it
> is not adequate as a runlevel editor and is not release
> quality. It is buggy. The maintainer isn't particularly
> active. A far superior alternative has been writt
Hi Sam,
how do you plan the future of netjuke? That package has a RC-bug; this
should be fixed ASAP.
Futhermore, Stefan has packaged the next version and put them at
http://home.arcor.de/sfr/debian/
I'd really be happy if you are able to continue the maintenance of
this package, perhaps together
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 02:50:15PM -0500, R. Wood wrote:
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 09:31:59AM +0100, Thomas Hood imagined:
Rcconf checks 'defaults' links in /etc/rc?.d/ directories
for choice as unset, whether the package has the start
file with the same number in /etc/rc?.d/(?:=2345)
"R. Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> rcconf has always worked fine for me BTW.
It works really fine for me too
--
.''`.
: :' :rnaud
`. `'
`-
On Sat, 2004-03-06 at 03:31, Thomas Hood wrote:
Please remove the rcconf package from Sarge. In my opinion it
is not adequate as a runlevel editor and is not release quality.
It is buggy. The maintainer isn't particularly active. A far
superior alternative has been written by Joe Oppegaard
A tous ceux qui sont curieux, dynamiques, imaginatifs, voire sympathiques (même
si ça n’a que peu de rapport, c’est toujours agréable..),
à ceux qui aiment la photo,
à ceux qui l’aiment sans le savoir,
à ceux (pourquoi pas ?!) qui se demandent s’ils l’aiment,
nous proposons de venir nous rejoind
17 matches
Mail list logo
