环保锡浆

2003-02-15 Thread NCC5
  您好:恭喜发财、生意兴隆、财源广进! 很高兴从网上了解您的信息,我想我们的产品对您也许有些用处,才跟您联系。这是一封善意的商业邮件,如果您感到没有意义,那么请您原谅我们的冒昧,随手删除它。未经您的许可给您发送本邮件非常抱歉!如造成对您打搅表示歉意! 本公司是一家专业从事精细化工(锡浆、锡条、助焊剂)电子工具产品开发、生产及销售的厂家。公司拥有一批优秀的高级工程师,技术力量雄厚,且拥有先进的实验设备和严格的品质检测系统,产品销往全国各地,深受新老用户的好评。 本公司生产的“晶而细”牌 SMT焊锡浆、焊点饱满光亮、印刷省力,脱模自然,不连焊,不假焊,厂价直销,“旺泰”牌系列助焊剂具有性能

Re: retitling ITP's [round 2]

2003-02-15 Thread Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 11:55:12PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > Hi guys! > > Last december, I pinged all ITPs that hadn't shown any activity in >1y > (see http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2002/debian-qa-200212/msg00064.html). > Some people replied, but there are still 143 left that the original

Re: retitling ITP's [round 2]

2003-02-15 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Luca! You wrote: > > I intend to retitle those to RFPs: > > Is it the procedure? > I mean: if no one packaged them in more than a year, it could mean there is > no one interested in that package any more. > More over, some of that software may no longer be developed or even exists. > IMHO we

Re: Proposal for removal of outdated/orphaned UPS daemon packages

2003-02-15 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
[Cc'd and follow-up to debian-qa] Hi Arnaud! You wrote: > some old fashioned power daemons for UPSs are still in database. > I'm talking about bpowerd and upsd which are not maintained > (no upstream source available), and orphaned (some bugs are 4 > years old !). > > Those might be removed, an