On 01 Feb 2002 16:20:01 +0900
Alex Shinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Silly Gnus, tucked away the mail into my debian.qa folder and deleted
> the CC duplicate. Sorry, just now reading this.
Hello Alex,
happy to see you're alive ;)... if your time is really limited and
you cannot/doesn't want to
Le Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:45:17AM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva écrivait:
> Hello Alex,
>
> happy to see you're alive ;)... if your time is really limited and
> you cannot/doesn't want to work for Debian now, I suggest you set
> the vacancy field for your account on http://db.debian.org
What a s
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> http://qa.debian.org/bts-help.html57
> http://qa.debian.org/bts-security.html50
> http://qa.debian.org/bts-unreproducible.html 260
How to tag a bug right to get it listed here. I would like to
tag #66190 for help. I j
Hello,
quoting you from
http://bugs.debian.org/93814
Received: (at 93814) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2001 22:21:47 +
...
> This work is nearing completion, within a few weeks I'll have it finished.
I think some weeks were over now. What about this package?
Regarding
http://bug
> Hello,
>
> quoting you from
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/93814
>
> Received: (at 93814) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2001 22:21:47 +
> ...
> > This work is nearing completion, within a few weeks I'll have it finished.
>
> I think some weeks were over now. What about this package?
I hav
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 10:39:12AM +0100, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> > http://qa.debian.org/bts-help.html57
> > http://qa.debian.org/bts-security.html50
> > http://qa.debian.org/bts-unreproducible.html 260
> How to tag a bug right to get it listed here. I would like to
Hello,
you gave a hint how to fix 104701 at
http://bugs.debian.org/104701
I do not know anything about mico-2.3.5 but I would care about an
NMU if you would provide a patch for the problem. I just do not want
to guess what is the right solution and can't test it.
Moreover I would like t
Hi,
the open bugs of netmaze seem to be easy to fix. At least the RC bug
should be considered to be target to fix soon. Would you care about
it? Should someone step in?
Further problem of the package: There is no upstream URL in debian/copyright.
A quick search showed at least
ftp://sunsite.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 11:17:25PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> This is available on http://qa.debian.org now for bugs tagged help,
> security and unreproducible. Thanks to Torsten for adding the feature
> to search for tags (keywords) to the BTS LDAP interface.
>
> Anything else we need?
Ju
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 03:21:57PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> 3) Hide 'upstream' bugs. Supposedly, they are worked on by someone
>outside of Debian.
> 4) View 'upstream' bugs. Check whether they are already fixed upstream.
This upstream tag is hopeless... I have like fifty upstream bugs and
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 02:47:02PM +0100, Tille, Andreas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> you gave a hint how to fix 104701 at
>
>http://bugs.debian.org/104701
>
> I do not know anything about mico-2.3.5 but I would care about an
> NMU if you would provide a patch for the problem. I just do not want
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002 09:23:54 +0100
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:45:17AM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva écrivait:
> > Hello Alex,
> >
> > happy to see you're alive ;)... if your time is really limited and
> > you cannot/doesn't want to work for Debian now, I
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 03:21:57PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> 3) Hide 'upstream' bugs. Supposedly, they are worked on by someone
>outside of Debian.
Let's not exclude these - they need to be fixed in Debian, either way,
and it's often easier to get a Debian maintainer to do something about
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002 18:18:23 +
"Colin Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 11:13:42AM +, Matthew Bell wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 19:12:45 -0600
> > "Colin Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 07:35:23PM +, Matthew Bell wrote:
> >
"Tille, Andreas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the open bugs of netmaze seem to be easy to fix. At least the RC bug
> should be considered to be target to fix soon. Would you care about
> it? Should someone step in?
Just s/ComplexProgramTarget/ComplexProgramTargetNoMan/ does not do the
trick.
Your message dated Sat, 2 Feb 2002 12:00:49 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Bug#131783:
qa.debian.org: use html anchors in update_excuses.html
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 08:03:05PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> amp (0.7.6-7 to 0.7.6-8)
That should be "amp (0.7.6-7 to 0.7.6-8)", because the
anchor tag shouldn't be empty.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
> "Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raphael> I did not contact the maintainer, btw, don't know if it
Raphael> would make things better, anyway...
Raphael> I cced him, we'll see what he has to say. Alex, are you
Raphael> still active ? Would you mind if
18 matches
Mail list logo
