Your message dated Sat, 2 Feb 2002 12:00:49 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Bug#131783:
qa.debian.org: use html anchors in update_excuses.html
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Feb 2002 00:00:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 31 18:00:07 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp3.ihug.com.au [203.109.250.76]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16WR7e-0006gR-00; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 18:00:07 -0600
Received: from willow.spacepants.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [203.173.131.160])
by smtp3.ihug.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id
KAA17687;
Fri, 1 Feb 2002 10:59:32 +1100
X-Authentication-Warning: smtp3.ihug.com.au: Host [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[203.173.131.160] claimed to be willow.spacepants.org
Received: by willow.spacepants.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id CDC8A7EEC; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 10:59:16 +1100 (EST)
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 10:59:16 +1100
From: Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: qa.debian.org: use html anchors in update_excuses.html
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.41.14213
X-Message-Flag: Magic 8-Ball says Outlook Not Good.
X-Mailer: beefmail v0.0
Reply-By: Mon Feb 4 10:56:10 EST 2002
X-No-CC: What Branden said.
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: qa.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-02-01
Severity: wishlist
I'm not sure this is the right place to report it, but to me, update_excuses
is part of QA.
I'd like to see <a name="$package"> tags in update_excuses.html, so one can
link directly to a particular package's excuses -- saves having to search
for them.
Thanks
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://spacepants.org/jaq.gpg
He may have come up with the recipe, but I came up with the idea of
charging $6.95 for it.
-- Moe Syzlak, Flaming Moe's
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 131783-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Feb 2002 02:00:53 +0000
>From aj@azure.humbug.org.au Fri Feb 01 20:00:53 2002
Return-path: <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
Received: from azure.humbug.org.au [203.143.238.84] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16WpU3-0002Zq-00; Fri, 01 Feb 2002 20:00:52 -0600
Received: from aj by azure.humbug.org.au with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16WpU1-0001vc-00; Sat, 02 Feb 2002 12:00:49 +1000
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 12:00:49 +1000
To: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: debian-testing@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Jamie Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>] Bug#131783: qa.debian.org:
use html anchors in update_excuses.html
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: "Thomas Bushnell, BSG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
debian-testing@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
Organisation: Lacking
X-PGP: http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/aj_key.asc
X-No-CC: Don't Cc me to mailing list posts unless you really have to
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 07:18:14PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> This really belongs over here, I think. However, is there a BTS place
> for pseudo-bugs in testing?
How about you just close it?
<a name="amp"></a><li>amp (0.7.6-7 to 0.7.6-8)
<ul>
<li>Maintainer: Fredrik Hallenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<li>80 days old (needed 10 days)
<li>out of date on arm: amp (from 0.7.6-7)
<li>out of date on ia64: amp (from 0.7.6-7)
<li>out of date on powerpc: amp (from 0.7.6-7)
<li>out of date on sparc: amp (from 0.7.6-7)
<li>Not considered
</ul>
Even better, how about I do it?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
The daffodils are coming. Are you?
linux.conf.au, February 2002, Brisbane, Australia
--- http://linux.conf.au/
