Adam Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2002 at 03:16:57PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> [snippage]
> >
> > * Anything else ? Please tell me ... :)
>
> * It can be used by users simply to watch packages they're interested
> in.
>
> >
> [more snippage]
>
> > It was easily reproduced - there's no libmwdrivers.a for powerpc and the
> > microwindows build tries to use that before it's built.
>
> No, no, a thousand times no. microwindows does try to build
> libmwdrivers.before it's used, and without someone giving me a log of
Not on powerpc it doesn'
> > I think that's a drastically unfair judgement. I would rather ask
> > every maintainer to do a few extra steps for the quality of their
> > packages (or better yet, to improve automated systems to notify
> > (opt-in) maintainers about such problems). The port maintainers
> > already have a si
Package: postfix
Version: 0.0.20010502.SNAPSHOT-5
Severity: important
while installing package "smtpd" from woody:
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/smtpd_2.0-4_i386.deb
trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man8/smtpd.8.gz', which is also
in package postfix
need i say more?
i su
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 06:17:07PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> Package: postfix
> Version: 0.0.20010502.SNAPSHOT-5
> Severity: important
Is there a real need to copy run-of-the-mill bug reports to -qa like
this? I can see it making some amount of sense if the maintainer was
very inactive and t
Here are the bugs currently tagged 'help' (with a few obvious mistakes
filtered out). If you're looking for some good challenging bugs to
attack, these might be worthwhile targets. Send information or patches
as appropriate.
12094 apache open important help
25159 apache open normal help wontfix
Your message dated Mon, 07 Jan 2002 14:56:46 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#112809: fixed in cccd 0.3beta4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a real need to copy run-of-the-mill bug reports to -qa like
> this? I can see it making some amount of sense if the maintainer was
> very inactive and there was a good chance that an NMU would be required
> before somebody spotted it in the cours
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 02:18:26PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Description:
> cccd - A small GTK+ CD player program
> Changes:
> cccd (0.3beta4-1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* debian/control:
> + Removed unnecessary Build-Depends libglib1.2-dev, xlib6g-dev,
> xl
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 02:18:26PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Description:
> > cccd - A small GTK+ CD player program
> > Changes:
> > cccd (0.3beta4-1) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> >* debian/control:
> > + Removed unnec
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 10:44:13PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Josip Rodin wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 02:18:26PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > > Description:
> > > cccd - A small GTK+ CD player program
> > > Changes:
> > > cccd (0.3beta4-1) unst
On Mon, 7 Jan 2002, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I think I read it in the Policy once... if the package links just to that
> one library, merely build-depending on it is fine; however, if it
> explicitely links to the others that just happen to be depended upon by that
> particular one, the other build-de
also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.07.1944 +0100]:
> Is there a real need to copy run-of-the-mill bug reports to -qa like
> this? I can see it making some amount of sense if the maintainer was
> very inactive and there was a good chance that an NMU would be required
> before some
tags 115625 patch
thanks
I'v adjusted the patch and now it doesn't clobber existing files.
Then the bug may be closed, as the forementioned DoS is not feasible,
and the clobbering problem is resolved.
If there are any problems related to the patch, please let me know :)
kind regards
--- reform
14 matches
Mail list logo
