Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there a real need to copy run-of-the-mill bug reports to -qa like > this? I can see it making some amount of sense if the maintainer was > very inactive and there was a good chance that an NMU would be required > before somebody spotted it in the course of other QA work, but LaMont is > active ...
I think the official reason is because it's an important bug in an important package. I would like to see such bug reports forwarded to an appropriate QA list . I have no opinion about whether that should be this one or not.
