Bug#91452: marked as done (Package echo-linux still has at least one file in /usr/doc)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:53:54 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line echo-linux bugs closed by QA upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now you

Bug#10949: marked as done (sharefont: should register itself in /etc/X11/xfs/config)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Mar 2001 11:00:08 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line sharefont bugs closed by QA upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#10950: marked as done (freefont: should register itself in /etc/X11/xfs/config)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:57:31 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line freefont bugs closed by QA upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#29570: marked as done (freefont: does not update X fontserver config.)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:57:31 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line freefont bugs closed by QA upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#36777: marked as done (freefont: Add fonts to font path in postints)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:57:31 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line freefont bugs closed by QA upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#5511: marked as done (freefont should check if xfs is used)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:57:31 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line freefont bugs closed by QA upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#58519: marked as done (saml does not compile on ARM)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Mar 2001 11:08:58 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line saml bugs closed by QA upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Bug#80767: marked as done (man pages in wrong directory)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Mar 2001 11:08:58 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line saml bugs closed by QA upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Bug#85187: marked as done (saml: failed to build from source)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Mar 2001 11:08:58 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line saml bugs closed by QA upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your resp

Bug#86078: marked as done (Doesn't work well with X4 )

Your message dated Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:57:31 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line freefont bugs closed by QA upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#91458: marked as done (Package freefont still has at least one file in /usr/doc)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:57:31 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line freefont bugs closed by QA upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#91657: marked as done (Package sharefont still has at least one file in /usr/doc)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Mar 2001 11:00:08 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line sharefont bugs closed by QA upload has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Fixed in NMU of knews 1.0b.1-5

tag 91755 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 06:53:21 +0200 Source: knews Binary: knews Architecture: source i386 Version: 1.0b.1-5 Distri

knews_1.0b.1-5_i386.changes INSTALLED

Installing: knews_1.0b.1-5.diff.gz to pool/main/k/knews/knews_1.0b.1-5.diff.gz knews_1.0b.1-5.dsc to pool/main/k/knews/knews_1.0b.1-5.dsc knews_1.0b.1-5_i386.deb to pool/main/k/knews/knews_1.0b.1-5_i386.deb Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Setting bugs to severity fixed: 9

Processed: Fixed in NMU of knews 1.0b.1-5

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 91755 + fixed Bug#91755: knews_1.0b.1-4(unstable): non-executable script during building Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)

type1inst_0.6-2_i386.changes INSTALLED

Installing: type1inst_0.6-2.dsc to pool/main/t/type1inst/type1inst_0.6-2.dsc type1inst_0.6-2_all.deb to pool/main/t/type1inst/type1inst_0.6-2_all.deb type1inst_0.6-2.diff.gz to pool/main/t/type1inst/type1inst_0.6-2.diff.gz Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Setting bugs to s

Fixed in NMU of type1inst 0.6-2

tag 91051 + fixed tag 91689 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 23:20:39 +0100 Source: type1inst Binary: type1inst Architecture:

Bug#91023: marked as done (man page in /usr/man should move to /usr/share/man)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:09:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#91023: fixed in netenv 0.82-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#91604: marked as done (Package netenv still has at least one file in /usr/doc)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Mar 2001 15:09:19 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#91604: fixed in netenv 0.82-12 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Processed: Fixed in NMU of type1inst 0.6-2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 91051 + fixed Bug#91051: man page in /usr/man should move to /usr/share/man Tags added: fixed > tag 91689 + fixed Bug#91689: Package type1inst still has at least one file in /usr/doc Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please conta

Processed: Re: Bug#92034: locale makes apt-listchanges break

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 92034 libnewt-perl Bug#92034: locale makes apt-listchanges break Bug reassigned from package `apt-listchanges' to `libnewt-perl'. > merge 92034 77185 Bug#77185: apt-listchanges: Error: Your vendor has not defined Newt macro Add at /usr/bin/ap

Processed: Merge

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 92034 important Bug#92034: locale makes apt-listchanges break Severity set to `important'. > merge 92034 77185 Bug#77185: apt-listchanges: Error: Your vendor has not defined Newt macro Add at /usr/bin/apt-listchanges line 83 Bug#92034: locale

Some nice feedback...

- Forwarded message from Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: Brian Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: NetSaint - You da man Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:31:53 -0900 To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I had been tasked with implementing a BigBrother server, and was scanning th

iitalian

Can some Italian folks please NMU 'iitalian'. thanks. Package: iitalian Binary: iitalian Version: 0.03-2 Priority: optional Section: text Maintainer: Fabrizio Polacco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Architecture: all Standards-Version: 2.5.0.0 -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fixed in NMU of python-pmw 0.8.5-1

tag 61577 + fixed tag 91615 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 00:04:28 +0100 Source: python-pmw Binary: python-pmw Architectur

python-pmw_0.8.5-1_i386.changes INSTALLED

Installing: python-pmw_0.8.5-1.dsc to pool/main/p/python-pmw/python-pmw_0.8.5-1.dsc python-pmw_0.8.5.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/p/python-pmw/python-pmw_0.8.5.orig.tar.gz python-pmw_0.8.5-1.diff.gz to pool/main/p/python-pmw/python-pmw_0.8.5-1.diff.gz python-pmw_0.8.5-1_all.deb to pool/main/p/

python-pmw override disparity

There are disparities between your recently installed upload and the override file for the following file(s): python-pmw_0.8.5-1_all.deb: priority is overridden from extra to optional. Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think the override is correct and the package wron

Processed: Fixed in NMU of python-pmw 0.8.5-1

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 61577 + fixed Bug#61577: python-pmw: new upstream version Tags added: fixed > tag 91615 + fixed Bug#91615: Package python-pmw still has at least one file in /usr/doc Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need