On 00-09-15 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> when I do an upload for Debian QA I do inform you before. I'm wondering if
> it's possible to agree that everyone who wants to upload a package for
> Debian QA sends a short note to this list before he starts working to
> avoid duplicate work.
> Could you agree to
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 02:32:06AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> when I do an upload for Debian QA I do inform you before. I'm wondering if
> it's possible to agree that everyone who wants to upload a package for
> Debian QA sends a short note to this list before he starts working to
> avoid duplicat
On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 02:39:49PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
> I think this is the normal behaviour of the people from the QA Team
> already to first announce the upload and then do it really. So I would
> say that the agreement is already there. :)
I have to admit that I forgot to announce t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 55375 fixed
Bug#55375: Cthugha depends upon mesag3 instead of libGL
Bug#70624: must depend on libgl1 and not on mesag3
Severity set to `fixed'.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 50821 fixed
Bug#50821: xabacus 5.5.2 available
Severity set to `fixed'.
> severity 60400 fixed
Bug#60400: The menu entry for xabacus points to /usr/X11R6/bin/xabacus instead
of /usr/games/xabacus
Severity set to `fixed'.
> quit
Stopping proc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 67935 fixed
Bug#67935: needs recompile to fix xpm4g dependancy
Severity set to `fixed'.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
On 00-09-15 Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2000 at 02:39:49PM +0200, Christian Kurz wrote:
>
> > I think this is the normal behaviour of the people from the QA Team
> > already to first announce the upload and then do it really. So I would
> > say that the agreement is already there.
Your message dated Fri, 15 Sep 2000 23:25:33 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed inxabacus 5.5.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Fri, 15 Sep 2000 23:24:53 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in cthugha 1.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Your message dated Fri, 15 Sep 2000 23:24:53 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in cthugha 1.3-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your resp
Your message dated Fri, 15 Sep 2000 23:25:33 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed inxabacus 5.5.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Fri, 15 Sep 2000 23:38:36 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in xtrojka 123-15
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
12 matches
Mail list logo
