Re: ppxp build failure

2004-08-28 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hello On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 02:03:46AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 01:49:59AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > * Luk Claes [Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:08:15 +0200]: > > > Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > > | Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > |>I have built the package in

Re: ppxp build failure

2004-08-25 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 01:49:59AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Luk Claes [Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:08:15 +0200]: > > Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > | Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > |>I have built the package in a clean pbuilder. It builds fine. > > > | So what explains the buildd failure

Re: ppxp build failure

2004-08-25 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Luk Claes [Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:08:15 +0200]: > Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > | Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > |>I have built the package in a clean pbuilder. It builds fine. > | So what explains the buildd failure? Can you upload it in a binary > | NMU so that at least we can get the p

Re: ppxp build failure

2004-08-25 Thread Luk Claes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: | Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | |>I have built the package in a clean pbuilder. It builds fine. | | | So what explains the buildd failure? Can you upload it in a binary | NMU so that at least we can get the pack

Re: ppxp build failure

2004-08-25 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have built the package in a clean pbuilder. It builds fine. So what explains the buildd failure? Can you upload it in a binary NMU so that at least we can get the package into testing?

Re: ppxp build failure

2004-08-25 Thread Luk Claes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: | See bug http://bugs.debian.org/267927. | | I only just noticed the ppxp build failure, which is i386 specific. | The -9 version was fine, but the -10 version fails. But the -10 | version only changed package descriptions

Re: ppxp build failure

2004-08-25 Thread knok
The upstream of PPxP semms very inactive. The homepage was not modified sice 2001. How many people use it? I think it's hard to keep it in Debian. -- NOKUBI Takatsugu E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ppxp build failure

2004-08-25 Thread Thomas Bushnell BSG
See bug http://bugs.debian.org/267927. I only just noticed the ppxp build failure, which is i386 specific. The -9 version was fine, but the -10 version fails. But the -10 version only changed package descriptions and the maintainer address. (All previous uploads were build by the maintainer on