Hello On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 02:03:46AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 01:49:59AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > * Luk Claes [Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:08:15 +0200]: > > > Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > > | Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > |>I have built the package in a clean pbuilder. It builds fine. > > > > > | So what explains the buildd failure? Can you upload it in a binary > > > | NMU so that at least we can get the package into testing? > > > > > I'm no DD yet, but I can try to do a sponsored binary NMU? > > > > Perhaps the RMs would prefer that to be avoided (CCing -release). I > > think I've read that in similar situations. > > I would *very strongly* prefer people not to do sponsored binary > uploads, ever. At least with sponsored source uploads it's possible to > audit what the non-developer has done. > > The build failure seems to be on i386. If it's really just a transient > failure on the autobuilder (and be very sure that this has been fully > diagnosed before uploading yourself, otherwise we're just setting > ourselves up for problems the next time there's a sourceful upload), > surely we can't possibly have a shortage of developers with i386 systems > to do this build?
I have done such an upload now. Regards, // Ola > Cheers, > > -- > Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- --------------------- Ola Lundqvist --------------------------- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 | | http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / ---------------------------------------------------------------
