On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 07:43:27PM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> As Michael Ablassmeier stated in #423349, back in May,
> mozilla-locale-tr is superfluous due to mozilla removal. The package's
> maintainer never responded to that bug.
>
> Has anyone any obj
As Michael Ablassmeier stated in #423349, back in May,
mozilla-locale-tr is superfluous due to mozilla removal. The package's
maintainer never responded to that bug.
Has anyone any objection if I file for removal on behalf of QA?
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 08:49:50AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Anthony Towns [2004-03-16 13:51]:
> > > > But it is difficult for me(currently) to maintain two versions of
> > > > mozilla.
> > > > So, I'll orphan it...
> > > Is anyone in
On 2004-03-16 Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 03:42:25PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
[...]
> > Is anyone interested in maintaining a mozilla-snapshot package in
> > experimental?
> Err, presumably it should just be called "mozilla" in that case?
* Anthony Towns [2004-03-16 13:51]:
> > > But it is difficult for me(currently) to maintain two versions of
> > > mozilla.
> > > So, I'll orphan it...
> > Is anyone interested in maintaining a mozilla-snapshot package in
> > experimental?
>
> Err
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 03:42:25PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > > I agree it sohuld probably be removed and a mozilla CVS or
> > > mozilla-snapshot package uploaded to experimental.
> > I think so too. it should be moved to experimental.
> > But it is difficult
See the thread starting at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2004/debian-qa-200403/msg00101.html
* Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-15 14:25]:
> > > Lastest upload of this package was on 2003-10-02 (version
> > > 0.0.20031002.13.trunk-1). Since then, mozilla ha
2004/03/15 (月) 06:03 に Martin Michlmayr さんは書きました:
> * Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-11 09:43]:
> > Lastest upload of this package was on 2003-10-02 (version
> > 0.0.20031002.13.trunk-1). Since then, mozilla had 6 releases, so I think
> > there is no n
* Martin Quinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-11 09:43]:
> Lastest upload of this package was on 2003-10-02 (version
> 0.0.20031002.13.trunk-1). Since then, mozilla had 6 releases, so I think
> there is no need for such an ancient cvs release, even in unstable.
> Moreover, I hav
Hello,
Lastest upload of this package was on 2003-10-02 (version
0.0.20031002.13.trunk-1). Since then, mozilla had 6 releases, so I think
there is no need for such an ancient cvs release, even in unstable.
Moreover, I have the feeling that this package is exactly the category that
shouldn't
Installing:
mozilla-locale-de-at_0.9.6-1.diff.gz
to
pool/non-US/main/m/mozilla-locale-de-at/mozilla-locale-de-at_0.9.6-1.diff.gz
mozilla-locale-de-at_0.9.6-1.dsc
to pool/non-US/main/m/mozilla-locale-de-at/mozilla-locale-de-at_0.9.6-1.dsc
mozilla-locale-de-at_0.9.6-1_all.deb
to
pool/non-US
mozilla-locale-de-at_0.9.6-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
mozilla-locale-de-at_0.9.6-1.dsc
mozilla-locale-de-at_0.9.6.orig.tar.gz
mozilla-locale-de-at_0.9.6-1.diff.gz
mozilla-locale-de-at_0.9.6-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
mozilla-locale-de-at_0.9.6-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to
auric.debian.org
along with the files:
mozilla-locale-de-at_0.9.6-1.dsc
mozilla-locale-de-at_0.9.6.orig.tar.gz
mozilla-locale-de-at_0.9.6-1.diff.gz
mozilla-locale-de-at_0.9.6-1_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian
Hi,
I installed mozilla navigator without
error messages.
After I start to run I'm getting
Warning: Actions not found: BtnUp, BtnDown
XFE_ToolbarItem::setBaseWidget(urlBar)
However from menu OpenPage I can
succesfully browse but sometimes
clicking on some menus mozilla goes down
Josip Rodin wrote:
> > M5 is out.
>
> Don't say! :)
>
> When we get it to compile properly, it'll be uploaded...
Good luck!
Regards,
Joey
--
We all know Linux is great... it does infinite loops in 5 seconds.
- Linus Torvalds
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the
On Sun, May 16, 1999 at 01:10:00PM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> Package: mozilla
> Version: 19981008-0.1
>
> M5 is out.
Don't say! :)
When we get it to compile properly, it'll be uploaded...
--
enJoy -*/\*- http://jagor.srce.hr/~jrodin/
Package: mozilla
Version: 19981008-0.1
M5 is out.
-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux betrayer 2.2.5 #2 Sat Apr 10 21:10:48 EDT 1999 i586
unknown
Versions of the packages mozilla depends on:
ii lesstifg0.88.1-2 OSF/Motif implementation released
On Sat, May 15, 1999 at 01:23:50AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> if i start mozilla i get the browser window which will dump core within
> 10sek.
> Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
> ... and gdb dumps core, too *yuck*
We're aware of the numerous
Package: mozilla
Version: 19981008-0.1
if i start mozilla i get the browser window which will dump core within
10sek.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> gdb /usr/lib/mozilla/mozilla.bin core
GNU gdb 4.17.19981224.m68k.objc.threads.hwwp.fpu.gnat
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is f
Hi,
I'm the maintainer of Debian mozilla package (together with Brent
Fulgham).
Martin Schulze told me this:
On Fri, May 07, 1999 at 06:27:00PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > PS: Kamop was complaining about both of you not reacting about
> > > his nmu-request. If y
On Thu, May 06, 1999 at 05:15:47PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> On Thu, May 06, 1999 at 06:43:52PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > The M4 is almost ready. Please wait a few more days (when you've waited
> > this long, it'll be nothing ;).
>
> How 'bout M5? ;)
Be sure that after I get M4 .deb uploa
On Thu, May 06, 1999 at 06:43:52PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> The M4 is almost ready. Please wait a few more days (when you've waited
> this long, it'll be nothing ;).
How 'bout M5? ;)
Mike Stone
On Wed, May 05, 1999 at 08:33:13PM -0500, Chris Mazuc wrote:
> It seems that this is the email for the maintainer of the mozilla package.
> The package in potato is currently over 7 months old, and this is
> unacceptable for a piece of software that is currently in fluid development.
&
On Wed, May 05, 1999 at 20:33:13 -0500, Chris Mazuc wrote:
> I wish to take over as packager for mozilla,
Several people are currently working on getting up to date mozilla packages;
their current work can be found on va.debian.org in ~joy/mozilla . Please
get in touch with Josip Rodin <
Hello,
It seems that this is the email for the maintainer of the mozilla package.
The package in potato is currently over 7 months old, and this is
unacceptable for a piece of software that is currently in fluid development.
For this reason, I wish to take over as packager for mozilla, as I will
Package: mozilla
Version: 19981008-0.1
Since I upgraded to glibc 2.1, mozilla stopped working. When I invoke it
with an URL on the command line, it manages to render the page, and then
dumps core. It does this with every page I've tried, including
http://www.debian.org.
Richard Bra
On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 16:16:03 -0800, Brent A. Fulgham wrote:
> I noticed that our most recent mozilla build is circa Oct 1998.
That was the last time it built on a slink system, before the switch to Gtk
as the standard GUI library (which required a newer Gtk than slink had).
> I p
On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 04:16:03PM -0800, Brent A. Fulgham wrote:
> I noticed that our most recent mozilla build is circa Oct 1998.
>
> I plan on attempting to build this beast, and was wondering if anyone
> objects if I do a Non-Maintainer Upload if I manage to build it?
As I see
I noticed that our most recent mozilla build is circa Oct 1998.
I plan on attempting to build this beast, and was wondering if anyone
objects if I do a Non-Maintainer Upload if I manage to build it?
Thanks,
-Brent
Package: mozilla
Version: 19981008-0.1
p0 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ mozilla
Warning: Actions not found: BtnUp, BtnDown
XFE_ToolbarItem::setBaseWidget(urlBar)
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
This happen when I first press the mouse button on it.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.0
Kernel
Package: mozilla
Version: 19981008-0.1
I fire up mozilla I then click on any button with the mouse and
it writes to stderr:
Warning: Actions not found: BtnUp, BtnDown
XFE_ToolbarItem::setBaseWidget(urlBar)
zsh: segmentation fault mozilla
The package seems to think it's inst
On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 19:56:36 +, Jonathan H N Chin wrote:
> > OK. I've just reassigned it to mozilla. Do you think "Severity:
> > wishlist" is appropriate for it?
>
> I consider it to be a significant bug.
> If I run lynx, I don't expect it to cre
> OK. I've just reassigned it to mozilla. Do you think "Severity: wishlist" is
> appropriate for it?
I consider it to be a significant bug.
If I run lynx, I don't expect it to create a .mosaic directory.
If I use emacs, I don't expect it to read .exrc.
Not havin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 21742 mozilla
Bug#21742: mozilla-smotif: ~/.netscape -> ~/.mozilla ?
Bug reassigned from package `mozilla-smotif' to `mozilla'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Ian Jackson
(ad
l9Uw-8A-00; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 10:27:06 +
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mozilla: Mozilla segfaults
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.6.1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 10:27:06 +
Package: mozilla
Version: 19980904-1
That's all there is
eived: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by kona.javanet.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id BAA07609
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 13 Nov 1998 01:16:30 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 01:16:30 -0500 (EST)
From: Chris Lawrence Amshey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROT
(Debian Smail3.2.0.102)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 8 Nov 1998 12:46:58 +0200 (IST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1998 12:46:58 +0200 (IST)
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mozilla: segmentation fault
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.6.1
Package: mozilla
t;
To: Debian Linux bug list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mozilla dumps core
Organization: CNUCE-CNR, Via S.Maria 36, Pisa - Italy +39-50-593211
Package: mozilla
Version: 19980904-1
Severity: grave
I just updated my slink debian system, and mozilla just dumps core. It
does not even draw the window.
98 02:02:23 -
Received: (qmail 16541 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 1998 01:57:47 -
Date: 15 Sep 1998 01:57:47 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: mozilla: crashes on startup
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.6.1
Package: mozilla
Vers
Package: mozilla
Version: N/A
Mozilla and all it's binaries should link against the libxmltok1
package and the shlibs contained within, rather than using the static
version and libraries which is the default build.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
-- System Inf
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 30278 grave
Bug#30278: mozilla: Mozilla segfaults
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 30278 26712
Bug#26712: mozilla: crashes on startup
Bug#30278: mozilla: Mozilla segfaults
Bug#27181: mozilla dumps core
Bug#29149: mozilla: segment
Package: mozilla
Version: 19980904-1
That's all there is to it really: I run mozilla from an Eterm, and it
segfaults.
-- System Information
Debian Release: slink
Kernel Version: Linux pick 2.0.33 #2 Sun May 10 16:44:29 EST 1998 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages mozilla depends o
J.H.M. Dassen Ray" wrote:
> This morning, I uploaded a mozilla (latest tarball) compiled with the fixed
> libc6 and libstdc++2.9. It no longer dumps core immediately after startup,
> and should be somewhat usable again (it's still alpha code of course). It is
> marked Maint
J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\) wrote:
> When that happens, can I close these bugs rather than mark them Severity:
> fixed? If not, who has the authority to close them?
I'd say that anyone on this list can act as maintainer for orphaned packages.
Richard Braakman
This morning, I uploaded a mozilla (latest tarball) compiled with the fixed
libc6 and libstdc++2.9. It no longer dumps core immediately after startup,
and should be somewhat usable again (it's still alpha code of course). It is
marked Maintainer: Debian QA group .
This means #26712, #
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 29385 grave
Bug#29385: Mozilla segmentation fault
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 29385 26712
Bug#26712: mozilla: crashes on startup
Bug#29385: Mozilla segmentation fault
Bug#27181: mozilla dumps core
Bug#29149: mozilla: segment
Package: mozilla
Version: 19980904-1
Mozilla terminates with a segmentation fault with no apparent activity.
A brief investigation with gdb showed:
Program recieved signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x40289e1c in _init ()
I am running mostly a stable (hamm) distribution, with the the most
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 29149 grave
Bug#29149: mozilla: segmentation fault
Severity set to `grave'.
> merge 29149 27181
Bug#27181: mozilla dumps core
Bug#29149: mozilla: segmentation fault
Bug#26712: mozilla: crashes on startup
Merged 26712 27181 29149
Package: mozilla
Version: 19980904-1
Mozilla seems incompatible with current libraries:
elad.33> mozilla
Netscape: Ignoring unsupported format code in mailcap file: %{
Netscape: Ignoring unsupported format code in mailcap file: %{
Netscape: Ignoring unsupported format code in mailcap f
Matthias Klose wrote:
>Package: mozilla-dmotif
>Version: 5.0b1-2
>Package: mozilla-smotif
>Version: 5.0b1-2
The bug-tracking system has sent these reports to me, but as far as I
am concerned these packages are orphaned.
Sorry.
>The mozilla-*motif package depends
On Wed, Oct 14, 1998 at 01:59:51PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> If this issue can't be resolved before the release is made, can we please
> remove the package out of slink.
I agree. It would have been nice to have a working mozilla in it, but it
appears to be unlikely.
&g
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Martin Schulze wrote:
>
> So it doesn't dump core with an older libc?
>
The old Mozilla runs fine on both the older and the newer libc6. The new
version doesn't run on either. This suggests the problem is with Mozilla
and not libc6.
Luck,
Dwarf
--
_-_
J.H.M. Dassen Ray" wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 12:41:23PM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote:
> > Has any progress been made on tracking down the cause of this bug.
>
> Not really.
>
> I've tried rebuilding the version that's currently in slink against the
> latest libs; this made no difference (
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 12:41:23PM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote:
> Has any progress been made on tracking down the cause of this bug.
Not really.
I've tried rebuilding the version that's currently in slink against the
latest libs; this made no difference (immediate coredump).
Yesterday I tried
Has any progress been made on tracking down the cause of this bug.
It seems a number of people are being affected by it.
Jay Treacy
Is there any hope of having mozilla work again, or should I install
Netscape? Am I the only one having this problem?
Thanks
On Mon, Sep 28, 1998 at 06:23:07PM +0200, Francesco Potorti` wrote:
> Package: mozilla
> Version: 19980904-1
> Severity: grave
What version of libc6 are you running? Michael Meskes noted that the problem
may be linked to upgrading to the most recent libc6 in slink.
Ray
--
PATRIOTISM
Package: mozilla
Version: 19980904-1
Severity: grave
I just updated my slink debian system, and mozilla just dumps core. It
does not even draw the window.
On Fri, Sep 25, 1998 at 04:20:59PM +, Stephen Zander wrote:
> Speaking of mozilla, I see it's currently being maintained by the QA
> group.
Correct. It was orphaned, and I did a build of the latest tarball (as I
think mozilla is an important piece of free software of which De
Package: mozilla
Version: 19980904-1
Severity: normal
Mozilla seems to ignore the text-align:justified css attribute for the DD
tag, while it honours it for the P tag.For an example, load
http://fly.cnuce.cnr.it/italiano/curri-co.html.
On Wed, Sep 16, 1998 at 01:56:37AM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Is it getting loaded against the correct libraries (ldd mozilla)?
>
> After I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH like the wrapper script does, I get this, which
> looks ok to me (very scarey, but ok):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is it getting loaded against the correct libraries (ldd mozilla)?
After I set LD_LIBRARY_PATH like the wrapper script does, I get this, which
looks ok to me (very scarey, but ok):
libxfe2.so => /usr/lib/mozilla/libxfe2.so (0x4000c000)
libXmL.so =
Hi Joey,
On Tue, Sep 15, 1998 at 01:57:47AM -, Joey Hess wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>mozilla
> zsh: segmentation fault mozilla
Is it getting loaded against the correct libraries (ldd mozilla)?
> It worked a lot better before it got linked to lesstif... seems that was a
>
Package: mozilla
Version: 19980904-1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>mozilla
zsh: segmentation fault mozilla
This was soon after I saw the startup screen. I didn't click on it or
anything.
It worked a lot better before it got linked to lesstif... seems that was a
step backwards. It'd probab
64 matches
Mail list logo
