On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 12:53:16AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 12:38:58AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > Colin Watson wrote:
> > > everything will be complete. It would probably be worth quickly checking
> > > sid too to make sure things aren't about to regress again.
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 12:38:58AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:47:03PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> >> So, I guess that's it, the FHS transition is completed !!
> >>
> >> Could someone confirm that before I announce the good news to the DW
just for the record:
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:47:03PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
>> So, I guess that's it, the FHS transition is completed !!
>>
>> Could someone confirm that before I announce the good news to the DWN
>> authors, please?
>
> No, I'm afraid that it is not
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 04:05:51PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 02:18:27PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:00:45PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > > (and remove that buggy page from the qa webserver :)
> >
> > No. I spotted the recently introduc
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:47:03PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> My bad, I did check an old version of nsd. The lastest did achieve the
> FHS transition. The good point is that I realized it before reopening
> the bug :)
>
> So, I guess that's it, the FHS transition is completed !!
>
> Could som
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 02:18:27PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
[a lot of right thing I did overview]
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:00:45PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > (and remove that buggy page from the qa webserver :)
>
> No. I spotted the recently introduced nsd problem because fhs.html tol
My bad, I did check an old version of nsd. The lastest did achieve the FHS
transition. The good point is that I realized it before reopening the bug :)
So, I guess that's it, the FHS transition is completed !!
Could someone confirm that before I announce the good news to the DWN
authors, please?
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:00:45PM +0200, Martin Quinson wrote:
> This page does not seem to be uptodate. It lists 3 packages, and when
> I look further, only one of them seems to still contain /usr/doc or
> /usr/man stuff.
>
> gtklp seems to follow the FHS since version 0.9n-1 (20 Jun 2002)
fhs.
Hello,
This page does not seem to be uptodate. It lists 3 packages, and when I look
further, only one of them seems to still contain /usr/doc or /usr/man stuff.
gtklp seems to follow the FHS since version 0.9n-1 (20 Jun 2002)
siagoffice-common seems also to follow the FHS (diff.gz contains
modif
9 matches
Mail list logo
