Adeodato Simó wrote:
> There was a little discussion about distributed-net-pproxy last month:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2004/07/msg00040.html
>
> To make it easier to sbd. reading the removal bug (CCed), e.g. a
> ftpmaster, this is the link for
* Matthew Palmer [Mon, 09 Aug 2004 16:23:17 +1000]:
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 11:18:02PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > distributed-net-pproxy should be deleted from Debian; see Bug 241112.
> > Can we make this happen? (I'm a little hesitant about the right
> > pr
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The procedure I've observed is that someone files a bug on ftp.debian.org
> asking for removal, ftpmasters reassigns the bug to qa.debian.org, and then
> tbm reassigns it back to ftp.debian.org with a rationale.
Ok, I'll reassign the existing thing to
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 11:18:02PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> distributed-net-pproxy should be deleted from Debian; see Bug 241112.
> Can we make this happen? (I'm a little hesitant about the right
> procedure for these kinds of cases; is it ok for me to simply queue
>
distributed-net-pproxy should be deleted from Debian; see Bug 241112.
Can we make this happen? (I'm a little hesitant about the right
procedure for these kinds of cases; is it ok for me to simply queue
the appropriate bug on ftp.debian.org, or should I ask here first?)
Quoting Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Stephen Stafford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040709 21:10]:
> > I've done some work on the distributed-net client package (trying to make
> it fit
> > for release) and came across distributed-net-pproxy while I was at it.
>
* Stephen Stafford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040709 21:10]:
> I've done some work on the distributed-net client package (trying to make it
> fit
> for release) and came across distributed-net-pproxy while I was at it.
>
> I'm not really interested enough in distributed-net
Hi,
I've done some work on the distributed-net client package (trying to make it fit
for release) and came across distributed-net-pproxy while I was at it.
I'm not really interested enough in distributed-net-pproxy to want spend the
time to fix it. It's orphaned, has had an R
8 matches
Mail list logo
