* Matthew Palmer [Mon, 09 Aug 2004 16:23:17 +1000]:
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 11:18:02PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > distributed-net-pproxy should be deleted from Debian; see Bug 241112.
> > Can we make this happen? (I'm a little hesitant about the right
> > procedure for these kinds of cases; is it ok for me to simply queue
> > the appropriate bug on ftp.debian.org, or should I ask here first?)
> The procedure I've observed is that someone files a bug on ftp.debian.org
> asking for removal, ftpmasters reassigns the bug to qa.debian.org, and then
> tbm reassigns it back to ftp.debian.org with a rationale.
> The way it's supposed to work (TTBOMK) is that "a QA team member" (however
> exactly that's decided) assigns the bug against ftp.debian.org with a
> rationale and the package quickly goes bye-bye.
> For whatever my opinion's worth, I think it should be flicked, too. I don't
> think there are too many people keen on doing QA for non-free stuff, and it
> certainly doesn't look like anyone cares about this one.
There was a little discussion about distributed-net-pproxy last month:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2004/07/msg00040.html
To make it easier to sbd. reading the removal bug (CCed), e.g. a
ftpmaster, this is the link for this second thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2004/08/msg00068.html
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of car
payments.
-- Earl Wilson
