Re: Trying to fix some packages maintained by QA team

2008-12-11 Thread Enrico Zini
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:40:51AM +, Enrico Zini wrote: > It's been a while I have it in my plans to create a debtags facet with > such tags. Are there plans to actually collect that kind of > information? (see http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debtags-devel/2007-September/001703.ht

Re: Trying to fix some packages maintained by QA team

2008-12-11 Thread Enrico Zini
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:11:03PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Julien Lavergne wrote: > > I'll try, but it's not easy to determine if a package should be removed > > or not, especially for the "better replacement" case. Is there some > > criteria somewhere for removals ? > Keywords would includ

Re: Trying to fix some packages maintained by QA team

2008-12-10 Thread Julien Lavergne
On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 23:11 +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote: > Keywords would include buggyness, dead upstream, long-orphaned, long > time without upload, low popcon. Thanks :) The problem is : when it can be considered as dead upstream (6 month ? 1 year ? 2 ? etc ...), low popcon (under 10, 100 ?) et

Re: Trying to fix some packages maintained by QA team

2008-12-10 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi, thanks for looking into QA. Julien Lavergne wrote: > I'll try, but it's not easy to determine if a package should be removed > or not, especially for the "better replacement" case. Is there some > criteria somewhere for removals ? Keywords would include buggyness, dead upstream, long-orphaned

Re: Trying to fix some packages maintained by QA team

2008-12-10 Thread Julien Lavergne
Thanks for the answer :) On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 21:51 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > well, send a normal RFS (I used to put debian-qa@lists.debian.org in > CC, jsut in case) to debian-mentors; personally, I tend to give > higher prority to QA uploads and for updated packages (instead of > completely

Re: Trying to fix some packages maintained by QA team

2008-12-10 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hello Julien, On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 21:41, Julien Lavergne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I found that some packages have watch files broken, so I tried to fix > some of them. The 2 first I found (phat and vbetool) was orphaned and > maintaining by the QA team. So I looked at them, fixed the watch

Trying to fix some packages maintained by QA team

2008-12-10 Thread Julien Lavergne
Hi, I found that some packages have watch files broken, so I tried to fix some of them. The 2 first I found (phat and vbetool) was orphaned and maintaining by the QA team. So I looked at them, fixed the watch file and some others easy things. But now I don't know what to do : - Can I request a re