Thanks for the answer :) On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 21:51 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > well, send a normal RFS (I used to put debian-qa@lists.debian.org in > CC, jsut in case) to debian-mentors; personally, I tend to give > higher prority to QA uploads and for updated packages (instead of > completely new packages) so I may upload them :) Good idea, I'll proceed like this for future request. Thanks for the advise :)
> > Maybe QA upload are only for fixing serious bugs ? > > Of course not! anyhow, just a watch file fix does not warrant an > upload: you can try to get the packages in a good shape, updating to > the current standards, fixing some bug, fixing lintian errors/warnings > or so. Of course, fixing the watch file is also a good opportunity to fix some of those problems in the same time. > They are much very welcome, and I encourage to work on them: you can > learn *a lot* from these kind of uploads. There are so many oprhaned > packages that need love :) A warning: before working on a qa upload, > check if the package can be removed instead (because it's very > outdated, has better replacement, and so on). I'll try, but it's not easy to determine if a package should be removed or not, especially for the "better replacement" case. Is there some criteria somewhere for removals ? > Cheers, Regards, Julien Lavergne -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
