Re: Special NMU for pgperl

2004-02-11 Thread Martin Pitt
Hi! On 2004-02-10 23:03 -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > >Do you think it is appropriate if I do the upload myself? I would only > >update the version number (so that it gets greater than the current > >one in unstable) and add an apropriate changelog entry. > > Yeah, it's good to fix things you

Re: Special NMU for pgperl

2004-02-10 Thread Nathanael Nerode
>Some weeks ago I separated some auxillary postgresql packages out of >the main source tree into separate proper source packages, among them >pgperl. > >pgperl is the original upstream name, so I just used it; but after it >was uploaded, I noticed that there already was an unrelated pgperl >package

Special NMU for pgperl

2004-02-09 Thread Martin Pitt
(Sorry if you got this email twice. My mail from yesterday vanished somehow, maybe it still appears on the list in some days). Hi QA! Some weeks ago I separated some auxillary postgresql packages out of the main source tree into separate proper source packages, among them pgperl. pgperl is the o