On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 01:07:54AM -0800, Nick Jacobs wrote:
> However, in the absence of such statistics, surely
> the number of uninstallable packages by
> architecture is some indicator of the unreadiness
> of woody on that architecture.
No, it's not. For potato, eg, arm released with roughly s
[Bah. Nick mailed me and the list separately with the same reply, so I
assumed he'd replied privately and sent this privately in return ...]
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 01:03:48AM -0800, Nick Jacobs wrote:
> --- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm afraid you misunderstand what that list is
--- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 12:47:10PM -0800, Nick Jacobs
> wrote:
> > You simply have the facts wrong - none of those
> packages have
> > RELEASE-CRITICAL bugs for i386. I refer you to the list
> of
> > release-critical bugs at
> >
> >http://ftp-master.de
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 11:56:25AM -0800, Nick Jacobs wrote:
> --- Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Enough to have started and to maintain the hppa port. You realize
> > that you are extremly rude to those people who spend much time to
> > port Debian to those archs.
>
> Certainly no
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 12:47:10PM -0800, Nick Jacobs wrote:
> You simply have the facts wrong - none of those packages have
> RELEASE-CRITICAL bugs for i386. I refer you to the list of
> release-critical bugs at
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/testing_probs.html
> which has the number of re
* Nick Jacobs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020401 12:47]:
> > You don't use apache, bison, the boot-floppies, etc then?
> > Not even
> > pcmcia-cs and syslogd?
> You simply have the facts wrong - none of those packages
> have RELEASE-CRITICAL bugs for i386.
They do. Check out http://base.debian.net/
* Nick Jacobs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
>
> --- Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Nick Jacobs wrote:
> > > Certainly not. Waiting for hppa (etc) support has
> > > delayed release of woody - that's a fact.
> >
> > That's strange, I thought that the existance of 20
> > release critical
> >
--- Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Jacobs wrote:
> > Certainly not. Waiting for hppa (etc) support has
> > delayed release of woody - that's a fact.
>
> That's strange, I thought that the existance of 20
> release critical
> bugs that noone is bothering to fix is what had delayed
> w
Nick Jacobs wrote:
> Certainly not. Waiting for hppa (etc) support has
> delayed release of woody - that's a fact.
That's strange, I thought that the existance of 20 release critical
bugs that noone is bothering to fix is what had delayed woody. Only a
few are architecture specific.
> > If you wa
--- Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Nick Jacobs wrote:
>
> >How many people are using Debian
> > GNU/Linux on hppa, anyway?
>
> Enough to have started and to maintain the hppa port. You
> realize that
> you are extremly rude to those people who s
On Fri, 29 Mar 2002, Nick Jacobs wrote:
>How many people are using Debian
> GNU/Linux on hppa, anyway?
Enough to have started and to maintain the hppa port. You realize that
you are extremly rude to those people who spend much time to port Debian
to those archs.
If you want to sp
(I've had troubles with the 3.0.8 disks on this box too)
-Craig
-Original Message-
From: Craig Coles
Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 11:17 AM
To: Adam Di Carlo; debian-testing@lists.debian.org;
debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: woody boot
Didn't see this message until now...
I will test this on a couple of boxes tonight. 3.0.8 fails on these two
boxes I will be testing on. (Dell laptop, and Dell Dimension 8100)
-Craig
-Original Message-
From: Adam Di Carlo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 10:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> Restarting the upgrade goes along quite well and then dies the second
> time trying to install gettext. Seems either it calls an emacsen
> script too early or without proper flags. Restarting the upgrade yet
> again fixes it and finally finishes.
Josip Rodin wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 07:09:16PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > So, earlier today I installed Potato on 3 machines, configured them for X,
> > run them for an hour or so and then upgraded to woody.
> >
> > Some issues:
>
> I think you want the debian-testing mailin
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 07:09:16PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> So, earlier today I installed Potato on 3 machines, configured them for X,
> run them for an hour or so and then upgraded to woody.
>
> Some issues:
I think you want the debian-testing mailing list, rather than debian-qa...
th
16 matches
Mail list logo
