--- Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nick Jacobs wrote: > > Certainly not. Waiting for hppa (etc) support has > > delayed release of woody - that's a fact. > > That's strange, I thought that the existance of 20 > release critical > bugs that noone is bothering to fix is what had delayed > woody. Only a > few are architecture specific. > > > > If you want to speed up the woody release, go to > > > http://bugs.debian.org/ > > > and fix bugs and supply patches. > > > > There are no outstanding release-critical bugs > > in packages I use on the architecture I have > > access to, so your comment is not applicable. > > You don't use apache, bison, the boot-floppies, etc then? > Not even > pcmcia-cs and syslogd? >
You simply have the facts wrong - none of those packages have RELEASE-CRITICAL bugs for i386. I refer you to the list of release-critical bugs at http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/testing_probs.html which has the number of release-critical bugs by architecture. Here it is: ---start quote--- Totals by arch: * mips:52 * mipsel:54 * hppa:91 * arm:54 * sparc:19 * ia64:39 * i386:1 * m68k:29 * alpha:27 * s390:44 * powerpc:20 ---end quote--- The *one* RC bug for i386 is not for anything you cite. Nick Jacobs __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - send holiday greetings for Easter, Passover http://greetings.yahoo.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
