Re: gbuffy needs a QA Team upload

2004-06-24 Thread Matthias Urlichs
Hi, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > for example, all developers use unstable rather than testing FWIW, I use testing on my machines. (apt-get doesn't allow pinning to "sarge" unfortunately.) Building uploadable packages is my autobuilder's job. It, of course, runs unstable in its chroot tree. -- Mat

Re: gbuffy needs a QA Team upload

2004-06-22 Thread Michael Stone
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 04:04:37PM +0200, Helmut Wollmersdorfer wrote: Sorry, I thought, that stable is important. What does that have to do with anything? Mike Stone

Re: gbuffy needs a QA Team upload

2004-06-22 Thread Helmut Wollmersdorfer
Martin Michlmayr schrieb: * Helmut Wollmersdorfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-21 23:54]: if testing and unstable grow apart, this would be a problem. stable and testing already growed apart - very far. Huh, I was talking about testing and unstable, not stable and testing. Sorry, I tho

Re: gbuffy needs a QA Team upload

2004-06-22 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Helmut Wollmersdorfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-21 23:54]: > >if testing and unstable grow apart, this would > >be a problem. > > stable and testing already growed apart - very far. Huh, I was talking about testing and unstable, not stable and testing. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: gbuffy needs a QA Team upload

2004-06-21 Thread Helmut Wollmersdorfer
Martin Michlmayr schrieb: Well, personally, I'm a bit afraid of testing and unstable moving apart... for example, all developers use unstable rather than testing but we ship testing... Don't forget all the users, which have testing for a long time now, because woody is very outdated. if t

Re: gbuffy needs a QA Team upload

2004-06-21 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-21 17:16]: > Thinking about completely removing it leads me to a question about > the package removal proposed by Andreas Barth: having the suite of > packages in unstable and testing to differ *considerably*, is a good > or a bad think? Should it be enc

Re: gbuffy needs a QA Team upload

2004-06-21 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Martin Michlmayr [Mon, 21 Jun 2004 15:38:07 +0100]: > * Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-20 20:17]: > > since I have not yet decided if I'm to adopt it or not (upstream > > seems to be dead) > Maybe it should just be removed? I'd remove it from testing right now. Thinking about c

Re: gbuffy needs a QA Team upload

2004-06-21 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-20 20:17]: > since I have not yet decided if I'm to adopt it or not (upstream > seems to be dead) Maybe it should just be removed? -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED]