* Martin Michlmayr [Mon, 21 Jun 2004 15:38:07 +0100]:
> * Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-20 20:17]:
> > since I have not yet decided if I'm to adopt it or not (upstream
> > seems to be dead)
> Maybe it should just be removed?
I'd remove it from testing right now.
Thinking about completely removing it leads me to a question about the
package removal proposed by Andreas Barth: having the suite of
packages in unstable and testing to differ *considerably*, is a good
or a bad think? Should it be encouraged, avoided, or just tolerated?
There may be *many* packages which shouldn't ship with a stable Debian
release but which may be worth keeping in the archive, herein my
question, since having them in unstable and not in testing (via a
fake RC bug) is the only way (at the moment) to achieve so.
--
Adeodato Simó
EM: asp16 [ykwim] alu.ua.es | PK: DA6AE621
And don't get me wrong - I don't mind getting proven wrong. I change my
opinions the way some people change underwear. And I think that's ok.
-- Linus Torvalds
