Re: Thinking of removing some QA packages

2003-08-16 Thread Aaron Small
* Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So you feel that the bugreport was improperly filed and should be > closed? > Yes, I think bug 158005 should be closed. It was marked as requiring more info to fix and I agree - there are no steps given, so I can't even try to reproduce this. > Just

Re: Thinking of removing some QA packages

2003-08-15 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 12:39:41PM -0300, Aaron Small wrote: > The reason no one's bothered fixing these bugs may not be that no one > uses the package, but that no one runs into these. The last two at least > deal with improperly dealing with files that are corrupt anyway. So you feel that the bu

Re: Thinking of removing some QA packages

2003-07-31 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 10:24:48PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 12:04:32PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 06:57:54PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > > Does anyone else have any opinions on the removal of these packages? > > > > They all look good;

Re: Thinking of removing some QA packages

2003-07-25 Thread Matthew Palmer
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 12:04:32PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 06:57:54PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > Does anyone else have any opinions on the removal of these packages? > > They all look good; make it so, I think. This one in particular: Bugs sent for all bar qcl (

Re: Thinking of removing some QA packages

2003-07-25 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 06:57:54PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > Does anyone else have any opinions on the removal of these packages? They all look good; make it so, I think. This one in particular: > qcl: 4 month old RC bug, absolutely no interest from anyone to fix it. > Nothing in twel

Re: Thinking of removing some QA packages

2003-07-24 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 06:57:54PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > xinvaders: non-free, orphaned 7 months ago from an MIA maintainer. One > "normal" (although I think by now it's probably serious, given it's > an FHS bug) and a couple of wishlist bugs with patches in the BTS. > E

Re: Thinking of removing some QA packages

2003-07-24 Thread Keegan Quinn
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 06:57:54PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > Didn't look at anything less than 200 days old, so that's it. > > Does anyone else have any opinions on the removal of these packages? Making them go away sounds like quite a good thing. - Keegan pgp4N0bmbzyau.pgp Description: