On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 12:04:32PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 06:57:54PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > Does anyone else have any opinions on the removal of these packages? > > They all look good; make it so, I think. This one in particular:
Bugs sent for all bar qcl (see below). I oopsed and sent multiple reports (instead of one aggregated) and didn't X-Debbugs-CC: debian-qa, but they're in. > > qcl: 4 month old RC bug, absolutely no interest from anyone to fix it. > > Nothing in twelve months. Has an incredibly limited audience > > (quantum computing researchers). Upstream says that it won't work > > with GCC 3.x (mentions it explicitly, so it sounds like they've had > > this problem before...). It will be a pain to keep. > > ... is being a bit of a pain for plotutils in testing at the moment. I missed the later reports in qcl's O: bug that someone else was looking at uploading (as of April). I've e-mailed him; if I don't hear anything in a few days, I'll petition for qcl's removal as well. It's time we got rid of a bit of cruft. - Matt
