Re: Status of clisp

2002-02-20 Thread Jordi Mallach
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 04:24:48PM -0800, Martin Quinson wrote: > Just curiousity: is it a RC bug to declare a program i386 only when nothing > really justify it (beside a long list of upstream portability bugs) ? I guess there are cases where the best solution is just to cut down the Architecture

Re: Status of clisp

2002-02-18 Thread Martin Quinson
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 06:42:11PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:56:07PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > > clisp | 1999-07-22-4 | testing | m68k > > clisp | 1999-07-22-4 | unstable | m68k > > clisp | 1999-07-22-5 |stable | sour

Re: Status of clisp

2002-02-18 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:56:07PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > clisp | 1999-07-22-4 | testing | m68k > clisp | 1999-07-22-4 | unstable | m68k > clisp | 1999-07-22-5 |stable | source, alpha, i386, powerpc > clisp | 1999-07-22-5 | testing | pow

Re: Status of clisp

2002-02-18 Thread Francesco P. Lovergine
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:56:07PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > clisp | 1999-07-22-4 | testing | m68k > clisp | 1999-07-22-4 | unstable | m68k > clisp | 1999-07-22-5 |stable | source, alpha, i386, powerpc > clisp | 1999-07-22-5 | testing | p