Re: State of dhcp3

2005-02-28 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 08:58:48PM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote: >If I'm adding myself as an uploader, do I use an NMU version number No. >or a normal maintainer upload version number? Yes. >regards > >Andrew >-- >linux.conf.au 2005 - http://linux.conf.au/ - Birthplace of Tux >April 18th t

Re: State of dhcp3

2005-02-28 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 09:31:44AM -0500, Eloy A. Paris wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 06:14:40PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 01:10:30PM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > > > > There's a few reasonably annoying bugs in dhcp3-client, that have > > > been open for a f

Re: State of dhcp3

2005-02-26 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 09:31:44AM -0500, Eloy A. Paris wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 06:14:40PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 01:10:30PM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > > > > There's a few reasonably annoying bugs in dhcp3-client, that have > > > been open for a f

Re: State of dhcp3

2005-02-26 Thread Eloy A. Paris
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 06:14:40PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 01:10:30PM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > > There's a few reasonably annoying bugs in dhcp3-client, that have > > been open for a fair while and have patches. > > > > I notice that there hasn't been an uplo

Re: State of dhcp3

2005-02-25 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 01:10:30PM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote: > There's a few reasonably annoying bugs in dhcp3-client, that have been open > for a fair while and have patches. > > I notice that there hasn't been an upload in over 6 months. Is there any > chance that any of these bugs can be fi