On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 09:31:44AM -0500, Eloy A. Paris wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 06:14:40PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 01:10:30PM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > > > > There's a few reasonably annoying bugs in dhcp3-client, that have > > > been open for a fair while and have patches. > > > > > > I notice that there hasn't been an upload in over 6 months. Is > > > there any chance that any of these bugs can be fixed before Sarge > > > releases? > > > > > > I'd be happy do look into preparing an NMU if you don't have time. > > > > Eloy and I have both been very busy with work, and so have not had > > much time to spend on dhcp3. An NMU would be welcome, on my part. > > Andrew, an NMU would be more than welcome on my part too. This package > is very important, and right now I don't have the time required to give > it the attention it deserves and needs. Same thing applies to Matt, I > believe. > > What I would like to see is more people co-maintaining this package. So, > feel free to do a NMU, but feel free also to add yourself to the > Uploaders list if you would like to help co-maintain this package. > > Thanks for the offer. >
Gar. Looks like I've left things a bit late to finally pipe up. http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2005/02/msg00918.html I'll probably still go ahead and make an upload, but I doubt it'll make any difference to sarge unfortunately. If I'm adding myself as an uploader, do I use an NMU version number or a normal maintainer upload version number? regards Andrew -- linux.conf.au 2005 - http://linux.conf.au/ - Birthplace of Tux April 18th to 23rd - http://linux.conf.au/ - LINUX Canberra, Australia - http://linux.conf.au/ - Get bitten!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
