Re: Orphaning my packages

2003-07-15 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is fltk still needed (since fltk1.1 is newer)? A few things still depend on it, though they really ought to be rebuilt against 1.1, if only to make the g++ transition. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL

Re: Orphaning my packages

2003-07-15 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Stefan Schwandter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-05-22 16:58]: > I have some packages left I'd like to orphan: > fltk, fltk1.1: The Fast Light Toolkit (www.fltk.org). A C++ GUI toolkit. > spiralsynthmodular (http://www.pawfal.org/Software/SSM/) : a modular > software synth. Needs fltk. > aseqview: d

Re: Orphaning my packages

2003-05-22 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Stefan Schwandter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd be glad if someone could orphan the packages that nobody wants to > take right now, because I don't have access to a debian system to do > it myself. I'd be willing to adopt fltk1.1, and will also upload a new build of spiralsynthmodular shortly