Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Is fltk still needed (since fltk1.1 is newer)?

A few things still depend on it, though they really ought to be
rebuilt against 1.1, if only to make the g++ transition.

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.

Reply via email to