Re: Implementing my proposal for the organisation of QA

2002-01-27 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 11:27:37PM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva écrivait: > so... now I'm back to my home... I was working away from my city > and had limited time to Debian... I am willing to make efforts > on this cause, are you doing some? We can use debian-l10n-english > for proof-reading, btw

Re: Implementing my proposal for the organisation of QA

2002-01-26 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002 09:55:09 +0100 Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > and that's why I think that the mia-reporting mail and stuff should be > > better documented... maybe the developer's reference... > > I know that, and if you read my other mail where I speak of the > Package Tracki

Re: Implementing my proposal for the organisation of QA

2002-01-10 Thread Grant Bowman
* Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020110 16:23]: > Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'd like to get this running, so I'd like you to tell me within one week: > > - if you seriously object against it > > - to tell your comments about the suggested tasks below > > I have no obje

Re: Implementing my proposal for the organisation of QA

2002-01-10 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd like to get this running, so I'd like you to tell me within one week: > - if you seriously object against it > - to tell your comments about the suggested tasks below I have no objection to having people that are designated as being responsible for ce

Re: Implementing my proposal for the organisation of QA

2002-01-10 Thread Grant Bowman
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020109 13:26]: > * Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020108 23:00]: > > A first proposal for tasks: > Please add: > [...] Thanks for the clarifications, Martin. I hope we can understand and document all this so everyone is more informed on what it takes to

Re: Implementing my proposal for the organisation of QA

2002-01-10 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:28:03PM -0200, Gustavo Noronha Silva écrivait: > > The even better thing is when we don't need to centralize the detection > > of MIA people because the community around the package takes care of it. > > That's my goal. :) > and that's why I think that the mia-reporting m

Re: Implementing my proposal for the organisation of QA

2002-01-09 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 21:55:12 +0100 Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 04:52:41PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr écrivait: > > Please mention the scripts in pandora:/org/qa.debian.org/mia (plus the > > README). It's true that most inactive maintainers are found during > >

Re: Implementing my proposal for the organisation of QA

2002-01-09 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 04:52:41PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr écrivait: > Please mention the scripts in pandora:/org/qa.debian.org/mia (plus the > README). It's true that most inactive maintainers are found during > BSP and fixing RC bugs; however, I think that the "MIA team" itself > should be rathe

Re: Implementing my proposal for the organisation of QA

2002-01-09 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020108 23:00]: > A first proposal for tasks: Please add: - take care of bugs reported against non-existing packages. This is handled by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Colin, Josip and me, with Colin doing most of the work) - take care of bugs when packages a

Re: Implementing my proposal for the organisation of QA

2002-01-09 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:00:15PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > - fixing bugs > - send bug reports for uninstallable packages, [ ... ] > - problems with testing > - failed builds I'm sure nobody thinks doing any of the above is a bad thing, but the above tasks fall under the general label "accommod

Re: Implementing my proposal for the organisation of QA

2002-01-08 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 11:00:15PM +0100, Adrian Bunk écrivait: > everyone works for himself at the tasks he sees. I propose to change this > to define tasks of QA work with usually 2-3 people responsible for each > area. These people responsible can do the work either themselves or by > organizin