* Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020110 16:23]: > Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'd like to get this running, so I'd like you to tell me within one week: > > - if you seriously object against it > > - to tell your comments about the suggested tasks below > > I have no objection to having people that are designated as being > responsible for certain tasks. But I think it's important that the > doing of tasks not be restricted to those people. They are just the > fall backs, in case nobody else happens to do it.
This has been verified a few times. It's a good point. > Further, I have the idea that the tasks should *all* land on the TODO > list, regularly posted. So, for example, every month there would be a > new TODO item added, relating to cleaning up stale ITAs. The task > would identify the correct procedure to follow. > [...] Use of the TODO system is rather orthogonal to setting up the structure of what to do and who will do it. It's a good idea for keeping in mind. Distilling your description down to clearly specified algorithms may be something that would be very useful. A separate discussion should take place on the use of this TODO system to influence the behavior of those carrying them out. -- -- Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
