>> "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just do not do mass modifications without reading contents. Some ITP
> are dated but recently 'adopted' by others. I recently
> closed/renamed some ITPs which are really dated (some years or so)
Well, to boot I wouldn't mind a few fal
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 08:51:50AM +0100, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> [ I'm still catching up with email, apologies if this has
> been discussed already ]
>
> >> Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I intend to rename all ITP's that haven't had any activity in the last
> > 100 days
[ I'm still catching up with email, apologies if this has
been discussed already ]
>> Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I intend to rename all ITP's that haven't had any activity in the last
> 100 days to RFP's. Any objections?
Cool. Can we have something similar for ITA's? Just p
At Mon, 14 Jan 2002 22:35:11 +0100,
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> I intend to rename all ITP's that haven't had any activity in the last
> 100 days to RFP's. Any objections?
>
> The bugs that will be renamed are approximately (my local bts mirror is
> a few days out of date) the following: (the filed and
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm, this would indeed be a better solution, the only problem being that
> it's not very easily automated. Maybe the bug should also be tagged
> appropriately (unactive or something) when sending the QA question. Then
> my script can easily determine whi
On Tue, 15 Jan 2002, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > For each apparently stale ITP:
> >
> > 1) If the last thing that happened in the bug is a QA question "Do
> > you really still intend to upload this?" and there has been no
> > response for thirty days, then either convert it to RFP or clos
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 04:27:48PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
>
> > The following ITP's will be renamed to RFP's
> >
> > squeak#68122, filed: 1168, changed 1168
>
> You can get the newest Debian packages from
> ftp://f
Good idea!
Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> I intend to rename all ITP's that haven't had any activity in the last
> 100 days to RFP's. Any objections?
including or excluding SPAM? :)
> The bugs that will be renamed are approximately (my local bts mirror is
> a few days out of date) the following: (the fi
tag 111560 + wontfix
thanks
Hi Torsten!
You wrote:
> > mosml#111560, filed: 129, changed 129
>
> I can't believe it. This was the software I ITP'ed when I joined Debian.
> It is actually quite nice but it uses GPL parts and links non-free
> parts to it. Theref
Hi Colin!
You wrote:
> > I intend to rename all ITP's that haven't had any activity in the last
> > 100 days to RFP's. Any objections?
>
> Please be sure to cc whoever ITPed the package (not always the
> submitter).
SUre. As a matter of fact, my script ccs everyone who has contributed to
te bug
Hi Thomas!
You wrote:
> For each apparently stale ITP:
>
> 1) If the last thing that happened in the bug is a QA question "Do
> you really still intend to upload this?" and there has been no
> response for thirty days, then either convert it to RFP or close
> it, depending on th
On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 01:55:32PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:35:11PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > I intend to rename all ITP's that haven't had any activity in the last
> > 100 days to RFP's. Any objections?
>
> No objections, a couple of suggestions that you're
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:35:11PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> I intend to rename all ITP's that haven't had any activity in the last
> 100 days to RFP's. Any objections?
No objections, a couple of suggestions that you're welcome to ignore:
* consider tagging packages with legal issues
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:35:11PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> I intend to rename all ITP's that haven't had any activity in the last
> 100 days to RFP's. Any objections?
Please be sure to cc whoever ITPed the package (not always the
submitter).
> xscrabble #91883, f
Hi Martin!
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020114 20:01]:
> > Hmm... it appears I did NOT receive a lot of the email in that bug.
> > Argh, I hate when the BTS does that!
>
> Of course you didn't. The owner of the wnpp pseudo pa
Hi Bas,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2002 at 10:35:11PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> mosml#111560, filed: 129, changed 129
I can't believe it. This was the software I ITP'ed when I joined Debian.
It is actually quite nice but it uses GPL parts and links non-free
parts to i
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I intend to rename all ITP's that haven't had any activity in the last
> 100 days to RFP's. Any objections?
I would propose the two-stage method in use for ITAs:
For each apparently stale ITP:
1) If the last thing that happened in the bug is a QA qu
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This problem with WNPP should be solved when people can subscribe to
> individual bugs.
Well, except that it really would be solved when that feature exists
*and* the "relevant" people are auto-subbed to particular wnpp bugs.
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20020114 20:01]:
> Hmm... it appears I did NOT receive a lot of the email in that bug.
> Argh, I hate when the BTS does that!
Of course you didn't. The owner of the wnpp pseudo package is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and the bug submitter (i.e. you) was not
* Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020114 22:36]:
> The bugs that will be renamed are approximately (my local bts mirror is
> a few days out of date) the following: (the filed and changed numbers
> are the dates of opening and last change of the bug, in days before today)
>
> The following ITP'
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> 100 days to RFP's. Any objections?
[...]
> cyrus2-imapd #108942, filed: 151, changed 151
Don't touch this one, it is not dead yet :-)
I have been packaging beta versions, and the bug tells the users where to
get them. Currentl
Bas Zoetekouw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> apache2 #103471, filed: 194, changed 194
Not this one. Daniel and Thom are working on this.
> gnue-common #104417, filed: 186, changed 186
> gnue-designer#104418, filed
22 matches
Mail list logo
