Hi Stuart,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 01:21:15PM +, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> > tillea@wr-linux02:/org/udd/udd$ svn diff
> > Index: config-org.yaml
> > ===
> > --- config-org.yaml (Revision 2163)
> > +++ config-org.yaml (Arbei
On 28/02/12 at 13:31 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:53:19PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 28/02/12 at 12:06 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > > Looking at config-
> > > > org.yaml, I suspect that the real problem is that the "release" key for
> > > >
Hi Andreas
> Thanks for the quick answer. Could you please confirm that this is the
> fix you have in mind:
>
> tillea@wr-linux02:/org/udd/udd$ svn diff
> Index: config-org.yaml
> ===
> --- config-org.yaml (Revision 2163)
> +++
Hi Lucas,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:53:19PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 28/02/12 at 12:06 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > Looking at config-
> > > org.yaml, I suspect that the real problem is that the "release" key for
> > > squeeze-backports is incorrectly set:
> > >
> > > debian-backp
On 28/02/12 at 12:06 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Looking at config-
> > org.yaml, I suspect that the real problem is that the "release" key for
> > squeeze-backports is incorrectly set:
> >
> > debian-backports-squeeze:
> > [...]
> > release: squeeze
> >
> > if set to "squeeze-backports"
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:20:31AM +, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> I think your changes are necessary so that the derivatives_descriptions
> table, which we are currently not populating, can eventually be properly
> populated, and there is some benefit in having the same schema for each of
> the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andreas,
> Status update: Tests on blends.debian.net have shown that we also need
> distribution column in descriptions table to handle backports-squeeze
> properly (otherwise the last one imported of squeeze and
> backports-squeeze would win and
Status update: Tests on blends.debian.net have shown that we also need
distribution column in descriptions table to handle backports-squeeze
properly (otherwise the last one imported of squeeze and
backports-squeeze would win and only those descriptions are injected -
at least with the current imp
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 08:52:53PM +, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> > My plan is to test the changes at the UDD clone running at
> > blends.debian.net for some time (3-6 days) and observe closely whether
> > everything will went fine. If this is the case I either ping Lucas for
> > further review /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andreas,
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 06:28:01PM +, Stuart Prescott wrote:
>> Given that it is a somewhat disruptive set of changes, I was offering it
>> up for discussion first. Since the main disruption is for the ddtp stuff
>> which you seem to
Hi Stuart,
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 06:28:01PM +, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> Given that it is a somewhat disruptive set of changes, I was offering it up
> for discussion first. Since the main disruption is for the ddtp stuff which
> you seem to be caring for atm and you're happy with it, I'll c
Hi Andreas,
> From reading the patch all seems quite logical. Why not simply
> commiting to SVN?
Given that it is a somewhat disruptive set of changes, I was offering it up
for discussion first. Since the main disruption is for the ddtp stuff which
you seem to be caring for atm and you're ha
Hi Stuart,
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 02:44:03PM +, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> attached is a patch to:
Thanks for your work on this.
> * rename the ddtp table to descriptions
Fine. I'll regard this (I'm currently working on the DDTP importer here
... after doing some cross country skiing - so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andreas,
attached is a patch to:
* rename the ddtp table to descriptions
* create ubuntu_descriptions and derivatives_descriptions tables
* import squeeze's long descriptions into the descriptions table,
referencing them by calculated md5 in the
Hi Jörg,
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 08:51:26PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > Regarding squeeze: Could somebody give some reasons for refusing an
> > additional field in the Packages files? It is hard to cope with "it is
> > unlikely". A yes or no would be more helpful to find a reasonable
> > de
On 12750 March 1977, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 10:29:50PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 23:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:59:25 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Regarding squeeze: Could somebody give some reasons for refu
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 11:04:06AM +, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> I think it's sufficiently easy to implement this in the gatherer that we
> should just do it there and that way we don't run the risk of breaking
> anything else. Moreover, even if we were to get dak to export this data for
> UDD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Andreas,
> Regarding squeeze: Could somebody give some reasons for refusing an
> additional field in the Packages files? It is hard to cope with "it is
> unlikely". A yes or no would be more helpful to find a reasonable
> decision for the UDD
Philipp Kern (08/02/2012):
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 08:30:47AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Regarding squeeze: Could somebody give some reasons for refusing an
> > additional field in the Packages files? It is hard to cope with "it
> > is unlikely". A yes or no would be more helpful to find
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 08:30:47AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Regarding squeeze: Could somebody give some reasons for refusing an
> additional field in the Packages files? It is hard to cope with "it is
> unlikely". A yes or no would be more helpful to find a reasonable
> decision for the UDD
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 10:29:50PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 23:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:59:25 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> > > Could somebody from the release team please give a statement whether
> > > there is any chance to i
On 12749 March 1977, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Could somebody from the release team please give a statement whether
> there is any chance to inject description_md5 fields into the packages
> files from Squeeze (and Wheezy).
Learn to read: In the last mails, cited many times, my sql query, the result.
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 23:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:59:25 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > Could somebody from the release team please give a statement whether
> > there is any chance to inject description_md5 fields into the packages
> > files from Squeeze (and
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 22:59:25 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Could somebody from the release team please give a statement whether
> there is any chance to inject description_md5 fields into the packages
> files from Squeeze (and Wheezy).
>
It seems extremely unlikely to get any change like that
[Trying to reach SRM via this list. To get the history of this thread
please see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2012/02/msg9.html ]
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 10:44:49PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
> >> You have them only for suites that have this feature enabled. These are
> >> all whe
>> You have them only for suites that have this feature enabled. These are
>> all where the following query hits (in projectb):
>> projectb=> select suite_name from suite where include_long_description is
>> false;
>> suite_name
>> --
>> unstable
>> propo
Hi Lucas,
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 10:15:44AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 07/02/12 at 09:11 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > [Joerg in CC in case he might not read debian-qa,
> > Lucas in CC because I was somehow expecting some answer from him
> > in this thread]
>
> Heh :)
;-)
> > Hi St
On 07/02/12 at 09:11 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> [Joerg in CC in case he might not read debian-qa,
> Lucas in CC because I was somehow expecting some answer from him
> in this thread]
Heh :)
> Hi Stuart,
>
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 11:26:11PM +, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> > >1. Provide
[Joerg in CC in case he might not read debian-qa,
Lucas in CC because I was somehow expecting some answer from him
in this thread]
Hi Stuart,
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 11:26:11PM +, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> >1. Provide the missing information in the Packages.gz files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andreas,
>1. Provide the missing information in the Packages.gz files
> anyway. Joerg, I have no idea how compley to implement
> this might be or what chances to break something might
> exist.
>2. We move English translat
Hi Joerg,
On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 10:25:56PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > So we have only description_md5 fields filled for sid and experimental.
> > It is lacking for all other releases and I honestly wonder whom to ask
> > to include this in *all* packages files without any exception.
>
> Yo
Hi
> So we have only description_md5 fields filled for sid and experimental.
> It is lacking for all other releases and I honestly wonder whom to ask
> to include this in *all* packages files without any exception.
You have them only for suites that have this feature enabled. These are
all where
[Ansgar as OP in d-d-a in CC - please tell me where to direct this kind
of questions to]
Hi,
when trying to import the new Translation files into UDD I realised that
the files are containing useless duplicates with no reason. It might
possibly not harm current applications but it might perfectl
Hi Stuart,
I just applied your patch on the UDD clone at blends.debian.net.
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 04:07:07PM +, Stuart Prescott wrote:
>
> I volunteered the other day to look at incorporating Description-md5 into
> UDD and the attached patch deals with this change in the packages tables.
Hi Stuart,
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 04:07:07PM +, Stuart Prescott wrote:
>
> I volunteered the other day to look at incorporating Description-md5 into
> UDD and the attached patch deals with this change in the packages tables. I
> think it is ready to apply to UDD right now as a pre-requisit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Andreas,
I volunteered the other day to look at incorporating Description-md5 into
UDD and the attached patch deals with this change in the packages tables. I
think it is ready to apply to UDD right now as a pre-requisite to fixing the
ddtp gath
Hi,
I noticed that we now have long descriptions somewhere else, however I
somehow missed the consequence, that UDD now does not feature the
English long descriptions as well.
I have written the UDD importer for DDTP descriptions and noticed
that the location where I was drawing the dscriptions f
37 matches
Mail list logo
