Hi Stuart,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 01:21:15PM +0000, Stuart Prescott wrote:
> > tillea@wr-linux02:/org/udd/udd$ svn diff
> > Index: config-org.yaml
> > ===================================================================
> > --- config-org.yaml (Revision 2163)
> > +++ config-org.yaml (Arbeitskopie)
> > @@ -104,13 +104,13 @@
> > archs: [amd64, armel, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc,
> > kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386] directory:
> > /org/mirrors/debian-backports/dists/squeeze-backports/ components:
> > [main, contrib, non-free, main/debian-installer]
> > - distribution: debian-backports
> > + distribution: debian
> > packages-table: packages
> > sources-table: sources
> > uploaders-table: uploaders
> > packages-schema: packages
> > sources-schema: sources
> > - release: squeeze
> > + release: squeeze-backports
> > descriptions-table: descriptions
> >
> > #debian-backports-squeeze-sloppy:
>
> yes, that's the change that I had in mind.
OK, commited to SVN. Remember: SVN commits are not auto-populated into
running UDD. It might make sense to populate this very change to UDD
because it is not related to the description-less packages file issue.
I'm not specifically interested to do so because I'm busy with the tests
on blends.debian.net and other things. So if somebody could do this it
would be nice.
> (is it worth fixing for the
> currently-commented-out squeeze-backports-sloppy too?)
Most probably. I admit I have no idea what this actually is and I
ignored this on blends.debian.net.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120228135045.gk15...@an3as.eu
