On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > Could you please tag them as "fixed" so that everyone sees that they
> > aren't present in the current packages?
>
> Euh, you want to mark bugs that might appear in the future as fixed?
> That sounds like the wrong way around..
It is perhaps not pe
Previously Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Could you please tag them as "fixed" so that everyone sees that they
> aren't present in the current packages?
Euh, you want to mark bugs that might appear in the future as fixed?
That sounds like the wrong way around..
Wichert.
--
_
Previously Anthony Towns wrote:
> modutils 108934 forwarded serious
Already fixed.
Wichert.
--
_
/ Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 03:37:24AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 03:13:21PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > For reference, bugs to focus on are:
> >
> > RC "base" bugs:
> > yaboot 109324 open grave
>
> trivial, just package the new upstream ybin, the fix for this bug is
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 03:13:21PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> xfree86 108185 open serious patch
Fixed in incoming for several days now.
--
G. Branden Robinson|The errors of great men are
Debian GNU/Linux |venerable because they are more
[EMAIL PRO
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > > procmail 103196 forwarded serious
> > > procmail 103278 forwarded serious
> > > procmail 104078 forwarded serious
> >
> > For the record: Those bugs are not currently present in woody or sid
> >
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > procmail 103196 forwarded serious
> > procmail 103278 forwarded serious
> > procmail 104078 forwarded serious
>
> For the record: Those bugs are not currently present in woody or sid
> and may be ignored. I'm keeping them open because they
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 03:13:21PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> RC "base" bugs:
> fileutils 108145 open serious patch
At the moment, our policy during the BSP is just sending patches for
these bugs, and not NMU'ing... should we be doing uploads?
> glibc 100336 forwarded serious
This is
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 03:13:21PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> For reference, bugs to focus on are:
>
> RC "base" bugs:
> yaboot 109324 open grave
trivial, just package the new upstream ybin, the fix for this bug is
the ONLY change i made (i am upstream).
--
Ethan Benson
http://www.alas
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
> procmail 103196 forwarded serious
> procmail 103278 forwarded serious
> procmail 104078 forwarded serious
For the record: Those bugs are not currently present in woody or sid
and may be ignored. I'm keeping them open because they might apply
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 10:54:05AM +0100, Edward Betts wrote:
> Looks like this bug can be closed when X -3 gets installed. Am I right?
IIRC, it should be. Anyone following the tech-ccte bug knows if it'll be
long before it'll get installed?
--
Jordi Mallach Pérez || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || Redisco
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 11:03:12PM -0700, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
[abiword]
> As I told dancer on IRC, I will hijack the package if nobody else will
> take it.
Please take it ASAP...
FYI, I tried to build a quick and dirty abiword 0.9.2 (just got sources
and uupdate'd) in paer (HPPA), and it failed
Anthony Towns wrote:
> RC "standard" and "task" bugs:
> xtel 105378 open serious
On Sun, 19 Aug 2001 17:17:05 +0200 (CEST), Eric Delaunay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'm the new maintainer of xtel and I'm in the middle of building the
> lastest upstream release numbered 3.3.0.
I assume th
Anthony Towns wrote:
> RC "base" bugs:
> tasksel 103773 open grave
Looks like this bug can be closed when X -3 gets installed. Am I right?
--
Edward Betts (GPG: 1BC4E32B)
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Anthony Towns wrote:
> binutils 109173 open serious
I'm looking into this. If someone that works on hppa can test
2.11.90.0.27-1 for me, I would greatly appreciate it. Otherwise, I'll try
CVS to see if it's already been fixed.
C
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 02:53:33PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> I have been looking at this, and I know this package is effectively
> unmaintained.
> However, I realize I am not up to it.
> Anyone?
As I told dancer on IRC, I will hijack the package if nobody else will
take it.
Anthony Towns immo vero scripsit
> abiword 108986 open serious
> abiword 109580 open grave
I have been looking at this, and I know this package is effectively
unmaintained.
However, I realize I am not up to it.
Anyone?
regards.
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netfort
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 01:35:02AM +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> The 5th Bug Squashing Party will take place on the next weekend, from
> Friday, 24th to Sunday, 26th of August, with the goal of fixing bugs
> (specially release critical bugs) in base and standard packages.
For reference, bugs to fo
18 matches
Mail list logo
