On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > > procmail 103196 forwarded serious > > > procmail 103278 forwarded serious > > > procmail 104078 forwarded serious > > > > For the record: Those bugs are not currently present in woody or sid > > and may be ignored. I'm keeping them open because they might apply to > > procmail-3.22, to be released soon. > > Could you please tag them as "fixed" so that everyone sees that they > aren't present in the current packages?
I think everyone should see the `Version:' in the bug reports. Before I consider these bugs truly fixed I would like to see a procmail-3.22 in the archives that actually fixes them. > BTW: I'd prefer using an epoch over the version number > 3.21.20010719.really.3.15.2-2 . And I'd much prefer using 3.22 over 1:3.22. Don't worry, I'll care about this if 3.22 does not actually fix the bugs it should fix.
