Re: Mico-2.3.5 bug #104701

2002-02-04 Thread Stephen Crowley
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 04:15:28PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:03:04AM -0600, Stephen Crowley wrote: > > that upstream refuses to fix. In fact I don't know if anything actually uses > > this pacakge any more.. maybe it can just be removed? > > Reverse Depends: > mi

Re: Mico-2.3.5 bug #104701

2002-02-04 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:03:04AM -0600, Stephen Crowley wrote: > that upstream refuses to fix. In fact I don't know if anything actually uses > this pacakge any more.. maybe it can just be removed? Reverse Depends: mico-bin,libmico2.3.5 libmico-dev,libmico2.3.5 Dependencies: 2.3.5-2 - libc

Re: Mico-2.3.5 bug #104701

2002-02-04 Thread Tille, Andreas
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Stephen Crowley wrote: > > I do not know anything about mico-2.3.5 but I would care about an > > NMU if you would provide a patch for the problem. I just do not want > > to guess what is the right solution and can't test it. > > > > Moreover I would like to fix the missing ups

Re: Mico-2.3.5 bug #104701

2002-02-01 Thread Stephen Crowley
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 02:47:02PM +0100, Tille, Andreas wrote: > Hello, > > you gave a hint how to fix 104701 at > >http://bugs.debian.org/104701 > > I do not know anything about mico-2.3.5 but I would care about an > NMU if you would provide a patch for the problem. I just do not want

Mico-2.3.5 bug #104701

2002-02-01 Thread Tille, Andreas
Hello, you gave a hint how to fix 104701 at http://bugs.debian.org/104701 I do not know anything about mico-2.3.5 but I would care about an NMU if you would provide a patch for the problem. I just do not want to guess what is the right solution and can't test it. Moreover I would like t