On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 04:15:28PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:03:04AM -0600, Stephen Crowley wrote: > > that upstream refuses to fix. In fact I don't know if anything actually uses > > this pacakge any more.. maybe it can just be removed? > > Reverse Depends: > mico-bin,libmico2.3.5 > libmico-dev,libmico2.3.5 > Dependencies: > 2.3.5-2 - libc6 (2 2.2.3-1) libmico2.3.3 (0 (null)) > > So I think it can go. Will you request its removal? Since we have > three other ORBs (Orbit, OmniOrb and TAO) still, I doubt many people > will miss it :-) > > -- > Revolutions do not require corporate support.
I agree.. I don't think anyone will miss it much.. the upstream packaging is pretty bad too, I say just get rid of it. -- Stephen
