Re: Let's remove netjuke

2005-09-11 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 04:22:07PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 12:56:28PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 01:12:35PM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 07:25:37PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > > I'd sa

Re: Let's remove netjuke

2005-09-11 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 12:56:28PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 01:12:35PM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 07:25:37PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > > I'd say let it linger in wnpp for a bit more, it isn't there very long, > > > >

Re: Let's remove netjuke

2004-11-27 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Sat, Nov 27, 2004 at 01:12:35PM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote: > On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 07:25:37PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > > I'd say let it linger in wnpp for a bit more, it isn't there very long, > > It's lingered a bit longer... Err, I was thinking of months, not weeks. There re

Re: Let's remove netjuke

2004-11-26 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 07:25:37PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 06:19:16PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-07 18:45]: > > > I think netjuke needs some serious love, or it should probably be removed > > > from the arch

Re: Let's remove netjuke

2004-11-08 Thread Jeroen van Wolffelaar
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 06:19:16PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-07 18:45]: > > I think netjuke needs some serious love, or it should probably be removed > > from the archive. > > > > Judging from the calibre of the bugs open against it, it is fairl

Re: Let's remove netjuke

2004-11-08 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-11-07 18:45]: > I think netjuke needs some serious love, or it should probably be removed > from the archive. > > Judging from the calibre of the bugs open against it, it is fairly > non-functional out of the box at present, and it's been orphaned for 2 >

Let's remove netjuke

2004-11-07 Thread Andrew Pollock
I think netjuke needs some serious love, or it should probably be removed from the archive. Judging from the calibre of the bugs open against it, it is fairly non-functional out of the box at present, and it's been orphaned for 2 months, and seriously neglected for about 18 months prior to that, a